Suppr超能文献

1兆赫兹和3兆赫兹连续超声作用下人体肌肉的温度升高速率

Rate of temperature increase in human muscle during 1 MHz and 3 MHz continuous ultrasound.

作者信息

Draper D O, Castel J C, Castel D

机构信息

Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Oct;22(4):142-50. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.22.4.142.

Abstract

To achieve the thermal effects of ultrasound, the tissue temperature must be raised from 1 to > or = 4 degrees C, depending on the desired outcome of the treatment. In the past 25 years, there have been no in vivo studies that have measured rate of change in temperature during 1-MHz ultrasound treatments, and none have ever been performed with the 3-MHz frequency. Thus, we are left to pure speculation regarding how long to administer an ultrasound treatment. We performed this study to plot the rate of temperature increase during ultrasound treatments delivered at various intensities and frequencies. We inserted two 23-gauge thermistors into each subjects' medial triceps surae at the following depths: 1 MHz at depths of 2.5 and 5.0 cm (12 subjects) and 3 MHz at depths of .8 and 1.6 cm (12 subjects). Each subject received a total of four 10-minute treatments, one each at .5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 W/cm2, and temperature was measured every 30 seconds. No significant difference was found in the rate of heating at the two depths (p = .987) within the same frequency and dose levels. The 3-MHz frequency heated significantly faster than the 1-MHz frequency at all doses tested (p < .001). On average, the rate of temperature increased per minute at the two depths of the 1-MHz frequency was: .04 degrees C at .5 W/cm2; .16 degrees C at 1.0 W/cm2; .33 degrees C at 1.5 W/cm2; and .38 degrees C at 2.0 W/cm2. The rate of temperature increase per minute at the two depths of the 3-MHz frequency was: .3 degrees C at .5 W/cm2; .58 degrees C at 1.0 W/cm2; .89 degrees C at 1.5 W/cm2; and 1.4 degrees C at 2.0 W/cm2. The results of this research should enable clinicians to choose the correct frequency, intensity, and treatment time when using thermal ultrasound.

摘要

为实现超声的热效应,组织温度必须从1摄氏度升高到≥4摄氏度,具体升高幅度取决于治疗的预期效果。在过去25年里,尚无体内研究测量过1兆赫超声治疗期间的温度变化速率,且从未有过针对3兆赫频率的此类研究。因此,对于超声治疗的时长,我们只能纯粹靠推测。我们开展这项研究,旨在绘制不同强度和频率的超声治疗期间的温度上升速率。我们将两根23号热敏电阻插入每位受试者小腿三头肌内侧,插入深度如下:1兆赫时为2.5厘米和5.0厘米(12名受试者),3兆赫时为0.8厘米和1.6厘米(12名受试者)。每位受试者共接受四次10分钟的治疗,功率分别为0.5、1.0、1.5和2.0瓦/平方厘米,每隔30秒测量一次温度。在相同频率和剂量水平下,两个深度的加热速率未发现显著差异(p = 0.987)。在所有测试剂量下,3兆赫频率的加热速度明显快于1兆赫频率(p < 0.001)。1兆赫频率两个深度处平均每分钟的温度上升速率分别为:0.5瓦/平方厘米时为0.04摄氏度;1.0瓦/平方厘米时为0.16摄氏度;1.5瓦/平方厘米时为0.33摄氏度;2.0瓦/平方厘米时为0.38摄氏度。3兆赫频率两个深度处平均每分钟的温度上升速率分别为:0.5瓦/平方厘米时为0.3摄氏度;1.0瓦/平方厘米时为0.58摄氏度;1.5瓦/平方厘米时为0.89摄氏度;2.0瓦/平方厘米时为1.4摄氏度。这项研究的结果应能使临床医生在使用热超声时选择正确的频率、强度和治疗时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验