Suppr超能文献

影响咬合间记录方法可重复性的临床因素及临床变异

Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods.

作者信息

Eriksson A, Ockert-Eriksson G, Lockowandt P, Eriksson O

机构信息

Department of Dental Biomaterial Science, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2002 Apr 13;192(7):395-400; discussion 391. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801384.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The reproducibility of clinical records of the occlusion was assessed in three dimensions using mounted casts. Three distinct areas were examined: 1) mandibular positions (intercuspal position (IP) or retruded contact position (RCP)), 2) materials used in recording the occlusion, 3) clinical variation.

DESIGN

Interocclusal records were made in a random order of three patients: one fixed prosthodontics case, one removable partial denture case and one complete denture case, with two different types of waxes, record rims, two different brands of vinyl polysiloxanes and one irreversible hydrocolloid.

SETTING

Private practice and Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

One general dental practitioner and three voluntary patients.

RESULTS

Point estimation of variance components indicate that 70-93% of the variation of the positions of the mounted casts are caused by: 1) clinical variation for all three cases and in three directions, 2) the influence of recording materials 0-29%, and 3) mandibular positions (IP/RCP) 0-11%. The ranges of the positions of the mounted casts were lower for the dentate case (0.04-1.39 mm) than for the partially dentate case (0.17-2.65 mm), which in turn was lower than those for the edentulous case (1.42-5.59 mm).

CONCLUSION

Clinical variation seems to dominate the variation in positions of mounting casts when making interocclusal records, rather than mandibular position or the recording materials used. Therefore a dentist who makes one single interocclusal record cannot presume that it will reproduce the interocclusal relationship intended, which in the present study was most obvious for the edentulous case. The results showed that impression materials stabilised by a tray did not differ significantly from waxes and record rims concerning the reproducibility. Therefore the stabilised impression materials are an alternative, which also give additional advantages like reduction of appointments as well as superior accuracy.

摘要

目的

使用模型评估咬合临床记录在三维空间中的可重复性。检查了三个不同的方面:1)下颌位置(牙尖交错位(IP)或后退接触位(RCP)),2)记录咬合所用的材料,3)临床差异。

设计

以随机顺序为三名患者制作了颌间记录:一个固定修复病例、一个可摘局部义齿病例和一个全口义齿病例,使用两种不同类型的蜡、记录基托、两种不同品牌的乙烯基聚硅氧烷和一种不可逆水胶体。

地点

瑞典胡丁厄的私人诊所和卡罗林斯卡学院。

受试者

一名普通牙科医生和三名志愿患者。

结果

方差成分的点估计表明,模型位置变化的70 - 93%是由以下因素引起的:1)所有三个病例在三个方向上的临床差异,2)记录材料的影响为0 - 29%,3)下颌位置(IP/RCP)为0 - 11%。有牙颌病例模型位置的范围(0.04 - 1.39毫米)低于部分牙列缺损病例(0.17 - 2.65毫米),而部分牙列缺损病例又低于无牙颌病例(1.42 - 5.59毫米)。

结论

在制作颌间记录时,临床差异似乎是模型位置变化的主要因素,而非下颌位置或所用的记录材料。因此,仅制作一次颌间记录的牙医不能假定它会重现预期的颌间关系,在本研究中这在无牙颌病例中最为明显。结果表明,通过托盘稳定的印模材料在可重复性方面与蜡和记录基托没有显著差异。因此,稳定的印模材料是一种替代方法,它还具有减少就诊次数以及更高准确性等额外优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验