Karagas Margaret R, Stukel Therese A, Tosteson Tor D
Section of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Community and Family Medicine, 7927 Rubin 462M-3, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756-001, USA.
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2002 Mar;205(1-2):85-94. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00133.
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) list arsenic as a major concern for Superfund sites and the environment at large. Arsenic is clearly linked to skin, bladder, and lung cancer occurrence in populations highly exposed to arsenic occupationally, medicinally, or through contaminated drinking water (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1999; IARC, 1987). While these studies have identified important adverse health effects, they cannot provide risk information at lower levels of exposure such as those commonly found in the US. Additionally, precise measurement of exposure is critical to assessing risk in populations consuming relatively trace amounts of arsenic. In New Hampshire, domestic wells serve roughly 40% of the population, and about 10% of these contain arsenic concentrations in the controversial range of 10 to 50 micrograms/l. New Hampshire, along with other states in New England, has among the highest bladder cancer mortality rates in the country. Therefore, we are conducting a population-based epidemiologic study in New Hampshire (1) to assess the risk of skin and bladder cancer associated with arsenic exposure in a US population, (2) to evaluate methods of quantifying individual exposure to arsenic at low to moderate levels, and (3) to explore alternative models of determining the dose-response relationship at the lower end of exposure. Our findings to date indicate that toenail arsenic concentrations are a reliable, long-term biomarker of total arsenic exposure and reflect arsenic intake by drinking water containing 1 microgram/l or more. We found that urinary arsenic cannot be detected consistently in a population for which drinking water arsenic is primarily below 50 micrograms/l. Lastly, our data suggest that use of a biologic marker along with alternative statistical approaches may aid detection of the levels at which arsenic may affect cancer occurrence in the US.
美国有毒物质与疾病登记署(ATSDR)以及美国环境保护局(EPA)固体废物与应急响应办公室(OSWER)将砷列为超级基金污染场地及整个环境的主要关注对象。在职业接触、医疗接触或通过受污染饮用水而高度接触砷的人群中,砷与皮肤癌、膀胱癌和肺癌的发生存在明确关联(美国有毒物质与疾病登记署,1999年;国际癌症研究机构,1987年)。虽然这些研究已确定了重要的不良健康影响,但它们无法提供低暴露水平下的风险信息,比如在美国常见的低暴露水平。此外,精确测量暴露对于评估摄入相对微量砷的人群的风险至关重要。在新罕布什尔州,家用井为大约40%的人口供水,其中约10%的井水砷浓度处于10至50微克/升这一有争议的范围内。新罕布什尔州以及新英格兰地区的其他州,其膀胱癌死亡率在全国名列前茅。因此,我们正在新罕布什尔州开展一项基于人群的流行病学研究,(1)评估美国人群中与砷暴露相关的皮肤癌和膀胱癌风险,(2)评估量化低至中等水平砷个体暴露的方法,(3)探索在低暴露水平确定剂量反应关系时的替代模型。我们目前的研究结果表明, toenail砷浓度是总砷暴露的可靠长期生物标志物,反映了饮用含1微克/升或更高浓度砷的水时的砷摄入量。我们发现,对于饮用水中砷主要低于50微克/升的人群,无法持续检测到尿砷。最后,我们的数据表明,使用生物标志物以及替代统计方法可能有助于检测出在美国砷可能影响癌症发生的水平。 (注:原文中“toenail arsenic concentrations”可能有误,推测可能是“toenail arsenic content”之类表述,但按要求未做修改)