Montero A, Ariza J, Corbella X, Doménech A, Cabellos C, Ayats J, Tubau F, Ardanuy C, Gudiol F
Laboratory of Experimental Infection, Infectious Disease Service. Microbiology Department, Hospital de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Jun;46(6):1946-52. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1946-1952.2002.
The treatment of life-threatening infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii has become a serious challenge for physicians worldwide. Often, only colistin shows in general good in vitro activity against these carbapenem-resistant strains, but its antibacterial efficacy in comparison with the antibiotics most used in clinical practice is not well known. We studied the efficacy of colistin versus those of imipenem, sulbactam, tobramycin, and rifampin in an experimental pneumonia model with immunocompetent mice. We used three strains of A. baumannii corresponding to the main clones (A, D, and E) involved in the outbreaks of our hospital, with different grades of resistance to imipenem (imipenem MICs of 1, 8, and 512 microg/ml, respectively) and to the other antibiotics. The MIC of colistin was 0.5 microg/ml for the three strains. Reduction of log(10) CFU/g in lung bacterial counts, clearance of bacteremia, and survival versus results with controls were used as parameters of efficacy. Imipenem and sulbactam (Deltalung counts: -5.38 and -4.64 log(10) CFU/ml) showed the highest level of bactericidal efficacy in infections by susceptible and even intermediate strains. Tobramycin and rifampin (-4.16 and -5.15 log(10) CFU/ml) provided good results against intermediate or moderately resistant strains, in agreement with killing curves and pharmacodynamics. On the contrary, colistin showed the weakest antibacterial effect among the antibiotics tested, both in killing curves and in the in vivo model (-2.39 log(10) CFU/ml; P < 0.05). We conclude that colistin did not appear as a good option for treatment of patients with pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains. Other alternatives, including combinations with rifampin, may offer better therapeutic profiles and thus should be studied.
耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌所致危及生命的感染的治疗已成为全球医生面临的严峻挑战。通常,只有黏菌素总体上对这些耐碳青霉烯类菌株显示出良好的体外活性,但其与临床实践中最常用抗生素相比的抗菌疗效尚不清楚。我们在具有免疫活性的小鼠实验性肺炎模型中研究了黏菌素与亚胺培南、舒巴坦、妥布霉素和利福平的疗效。我们使用了三株鲍曼不动杆菌,它们对应于我院暴发中涉及的主要克隆(A、D和E),对亚胺培南(亚胺培南MIC分别为1、8和512μg/ml)和其他抗生素具有不同程度的耐药性。这三株菌株的黏菌素MIC均为0.5μg/ml。将肺细菌计数中log(10)CFU/g的降低、菌血症的清除以及与对照组结果相比的生存率用作疗效参数。亚胺培南和舒巴坦(肺细菌计数降低:-5.38和-4.64 log(10)CFU/ml)在敏感甚至中介菌株感染中显示出最高水平的杀菌疗效。妥布霉素和利福平(-4.16和-5.15 log(10)CFU/ml)对中介或中度耐药菌株取得了良好效果,这与杀菌曲线和药效学一致。相反,在测试的抗生素中,无论是在杀菌曲线还是体内模型中,黏菌素都显示出最弱的抗菌作用(-2.39 log(10)CFU/ml;P<0.05)。我们得出结论,对于耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌菌株所致肺炎患者,黏菌素似乎不是一个好的治疗选择。其他替代方案,包括与利福平联合使用,可能具有更好的治疗效果,因此应该进行研究。