Ashford Nicholas A, Castleman Barry, Frank Arthur L, Giannasi Fernanda, Goldman Lynn R, Greenberg Morris, Huff James, Joshi Kant Tushar, LaDou Joseph, Lemen Richard A, Maltoni Cesare, O'Neil Rory, Richter Elihu, Silbergeld Ellen K, Teitelbaum Daniel T, Thebaud-Mony Annie, Tomatis Lorenzo, Watterson Andrew
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002 Apr-Jun;8(2):156-62. doi: 10.1179/107735202800338984.
The ICOH has played a key role in the development of some scientific documents and policy recommendations, but it has not always been scientifically objective, particularly in regard to asbestos and other fibers and some chemicals and pesticides. Many ICOH members are employees of corporations or consultants to industry, serving multinational corporate interests to influence public health policy in the guise of a professional scientific organization. ICOH members' conflicts of interest with the public health dominate the organization and damage the standing of the ICOH. Official recognition of the ICOH compromises the credibility of the WHO and the ILO. It is inappropriate for the ICOH to continue to receive WHO and ILO recognition unless the ICOH is recognized as an industry organization.
国际职业卫生委员会（ICOH）在一些科学文件和政策建议的制定过程中发挥了关键作用，但它并非一直保持科学客观性，尤其是在石棉及其他纤维、某些化学品和农药方面。许多ICOH成员是企业雇员或行业顾问，以专业科学组织的名义为跨国企业利益服务，影响公共卫生政策。ICOH成员在公共卫生方面的利益冲突主导着该组织，损害了ICOH的声誉。对ICOH的官方认可损害了世界卫生组织（WHO）和国际劳工组织（ILO）的公信力。除非ICOH被承认为行业组织，否则它继续获得WHO和ILO的认可是不合适的。
