Suppr超能文献

国际职业健康

International occupational health.

作者信息

LaDou Joseph

机构信息

International Center for Occupational Medicine, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, California 94143-0924, USA.

出版信息

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2003 Aug;206(4-5):303-13. doi: 10.1078/1438-4639-00226.

Abstract

Working conditions for the majority of the world's workers do not meet the minimum standards and guidelines set by international agencies. Occupational health and safety laws cover only about 10 percent of the population in developing countries, omitting many major hazardous industries and occupations. With rare exception, most countries defer to the United Nations the responsibility for international occupational health. The UN's international agencies have had limited success in bringing occupational health to the industrializing countries. The International Labor Organization (ILO) conventions are intended to guide all countries in the promotion of workplace safety and in managing occupational health and safety programs. ILO conventions and recommendations on occupational safety and health are international agreements that have legal force only if they are ratified by ILO member states. The most important ILO Convention on Occupational Safety and Health has been ratified by only 37 of the 175 ILO member states. Only 23 countries have ratified the ILO Employment Injury Benefits Convention that lists occupational diseases for which compensation should be paid. The World Health Organization (WHO) is responsible for the technical aspects of occupational health and safety, the promotion of medical services and hygienic standards. Limited WHO and ILO funding severely impedes the development of international occupational health. The U.S. reliance on international agencies to promote health and safety in the industrializing countries is not nearly adequate. This is particularly true if occupational health continues to be regarded primarily as an academic exercise by the developed countries, and a budgetary triviality by the international agencies. Occupational health is not a goal achievable in isolation. It should be part of a major institutional development that touches and reforms every level of government in an industrializing country. Occupational health and safety should be brought to industrializing countries by a comprehensive consultative program sponsored by the United States and other countries that are willing to share the burden. Occupational health and safety program development is tied to the economic success of the industrializing country and its industries. Only after the development of a successful legal and economic system in an industrializing country is it possible to incorporate a successful program of occupational health and safety.

摘要

世界上大多数劳动者的工作条件未达到国际机构设定的最低标准和准则。职业健康与安全法律仅覆盖发展中国家约10%的人口,许多主要危险行业和职业被排除在外。除极少数例外情况,大多数国家将国际职业健康的责任交给联合国。联合国的国际机构在将职业健康推广到工业化国家方面成效有限。国际劳工组织(ILO)的公约旨在指导所有国家促进工作场所安全以及管理职业健康与安全项目。ILO关于职业安全与健康的公约和建议是国际协定,只有在得到ILO成员国批准后才具有法律效力。ILO最重要的职业安全与健康公约仅得到175个ILO成员国中37个国家的批准。只有23个国家批准了列出应支付赔偿的职业病的ILO《工伤津贴公约》。世界卫生组织(WHO)负责职业健康与安全的技术方面、医疗服务的推广以及卫生标准。WHO和ILO资金有限严重阻碍了国际职业健康的发展。美国依靠国际机构在工业化国家促进健康与安全远远不够。如果职业健康继续主要被发达国家视为学术活动,被国际机构视为预算琐事,情况尤其如此。职业健康不是一个可以孤立实现的目标。它应该成为一项重大机构发展的一部分,涉及并改革工业化国家各级政府。职业健康与安全应由美国和其他愿意分担负担的国家发起的全面协商计划引入工业化国家。职业健康与安全项目的发展与工业化国家及其产业的经济成功息息相关。只有在工业化国家建立起成功的法律和经济体系之后,才有可能纳入成功的职业健康与安全项目。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验