• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

SENC(西班牙依非韦伦与奈韦拉平对比)试验:一项针对初治HIV感染个体的随机、开放标签研究。

SENC (Spanish efavirenz vs. nevirapine comparison) trial: a randomized, open-label study in HIV-infected naive individuals.

作者信息

Núñez Marina, Soriano Vincent, Martín-Carbonero Luz, Barrios Ana, Barreiro Pablo, Blanco Francisco, García-Benayas Teresa, González-Lahoz Juan

机构信息

Service of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Carlos III, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

HIV Clin Trials. 2002 May-Jun;3(3):186-94. doi: 10.1310/0cj5-2abq-cb00-6mr6.

DOI:10.1310/0cj5-2abq-cb00-6mr6
PMID:12032877
Abstract

PURPOSE

A randomized, open-label, pilot study was undertaken to explore the antiviral activity and tolerability of two nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), nevirapine (NVP) and efavirenz (EFV).

METHOD

HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive adults with CD4 counts >100 cells/mm(3) and detectable plasma HIV RNA below 100,000 copies/mL were randomized to receive didanosine (ddI) and stavudine (d4T) plus either NVP or EFV. Assessments were made every 12 weeks. Primary endpoints were the proportion of patients reaching plasma HIV RNA <50 copies/mL and/or developing NNRTI-related toxicities leading to drug discontinuation. Baseline characteristics were comparable for participants in the EFV (n = 31) and NVP arms (n = 36).

RESULTS

At 48 weeks, 23/31 (74%) patients in the EFV group and 23/36 (64%) in the NVP group had <50 HIV RNA copies/mL (intention-to-treat analysis). Adverse events led to NNRTI discontinuation in 4 and 3 patients in the EFV and NVP arms, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between groups regarding any primary endpoint. NVP and EFV along with two NRTIs may be equally well tolerated and effective at achieving <50 HIV RNA copies/mL in naive patients with CD4 counts >100 cells/mm(3) and HIV RNA <10(5) copies/mL.

CONCLUSION

A much larger study is needed to demonstrate any significant differences between NVP and EFV, if they exist at all.

摘要

目的

开展一项随机、开放标签的试点研究,以探索两种非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)奈韦拉平(NVP)和依非韦伦(EFV)的抗病毒活性和耐受性。

方法

将CD4细胞计数>100个细胞/mm³且血浆HIV RNA低于100,000拷贝/mL的初治HIV感染成人随机分组,接受去羟肌苷(ddI)和司他夫定(d4T)加NVP或EFV治疗。每12周进行一次评估。主要终点是血浆HIV RNA<50拷贝/mL的患者比例和/或发生导致停药的与NNRTI相关的毒性反应。依非韦伦组(n = 31)和奈韦拉平组(n = 36)参与者的基线特征具有可比性。

结果

在48周时,依非韦伦组23/31(74%)的患者和奈韦拉平组23/36(64%)的患者血浆HIV RNA<50拷贝/mL(意向性分析)。依非韦伦组和奈韦拉平组分别有4例和3例患者因不良事件停用NNRTI。两组在任何主要终点方面均无统计学显著差异。对于CD4细胞计数>100个细胞/mm³且HIV RNA<10⁵拷贝/mL的初治患者,NVP和EFV与两种核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂联合使用时,耐受性可能相当,且在使血浆HIV RNA<50拷贝/mL方面同样有效。

结论

需要开展规模大得多的研究来证明NVP和EFV之间是否存在任何显著差异(如果确实存在差异的话)。

相似文献

1
SENC (Spanish efavirenz vs. nevirapine comparison) trial: a randomized, open-label study in HIV-infected naive individuals.SENC(西班牙依非韦伦与奈韦拉平对比)试验:一项针对初治HIV感染个体的随机、开放标签研究。
HIV Clin Trials. 2002 May-Jun;3(3):186-94. doi: 10.1310/0cj5-2abq-cb00-6mr6.
2
Randomized, open-label, comparative trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three antiretroviral drug combinations including two nucleoside analogues and nevirapine for previously untreated HIV-1 Infection: the OzCombo 2 study.一项随机、开放标签、比较性试验,旨在评估三种抗逆转录病毒药物组合(包括两种核苷类似物和奈韦拉平)用于既往未接受治疗的HIV-1感染的疗效和安全性:OzCombo 2研究。
HIV Clin Trials. 2002 May-Jun;3(3):177-85. doi: 10.1310/9n21-1hg1-7n1q-jkw1.
3
Comparison of nevirapine- and efavirenz-containing antiretroviral regimens in antiretroviral-naïve patients: a cohort study.初治抗逆转录病毒治疗患者中含奈韦拉平与依非韦伦的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案比较:一项队列研究
HIV Clin Trials. 2002 Jul-Aug;3(4):296-303. doi: 10.1310/M47B-R51C-X0MC-K3GW.
4
Nevirapine plus efavirenz plus didanosine: a simple, safe, and effective once-daily regimen for patients with HIV infection.奈韦拉平加依非韦伦加去羟肌苷:一种针对HIV感染患者的简单、安全且有效的每日一次治疗方案。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2003 Dec;95(12):1152-7.
5
Efavirenz or nevirapine in three-drug combination therapy with two nucleoside or nucleotide-reverse transcriptase inhibitors for initial treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral-naïve individuals.依非韦伦或奈韦拉平与两种核苷类或核苷酸类逆转录酶抑制剂联合用于初治抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV感染者的初始治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 10;12(12):CD004246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004246.pub4.
6
The effect of baseline CD4 cell count and HIV-1 viral load on the efficacy and safety of nevirapine or efavirenz-based first-line HAART.基线CD4细胞计数和HIV-1病毒载量对以奈韦拉平或依非韦伦为基础的一线高效抗逆转录病毒治疗的疗效和安全性的影响。
AIDS. 2005 Mar 25;19(5):463-71. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000162334.12815.5b.
7
Nevirapine versus efavirenz based antiretroviral treatment in naive Indian patients: comparison of effectiveness in clinical cohort.初治印度患者中基于奈韦拉平与依非韦伦的抗逆转录病毒治疗:临床队列中的疗效比较
J Assoc Physicians India. 2006 Dec;54:915-8.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of nevirapine- versus efavirenz-containing regimens in HIV-infected Thai children.奈韦拉平与依非韦伦治疗方案对泰国HIV感染儿童的疗效和耐受性比较
Int J Infect Dis. 2008 Nov;12(6):e33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2007.10.008. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
9
Virological and immunological responses to once-daily dosing of didanosine in combination with stavudine. AI454-143 Team.对司他夫定联合每日一次服用去羟肌苷的病毒学和免疫学反应。AI454 - 143研究团队。
AIDS. 1999 Jul 30;13(11):F87-93. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199907300-00003.
10
Comparison of twice-daily stavudine plus once- or twice-daily didanosine and nevirapine in early stages of HIV infection: the scan study.
AIDS. 2000 Nov 10;14(16):2485-94. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200011100-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
AIDS Clinical Research in Spain-Large HIV Population, Geniality of Doctors, and Missing Opportunities.西班牙艾滋病临床研究——庞大的 HIV 人群、医生的才智以及错失的机会。
Viruses. 2018 May 30;10(6):293. doi: 10.3390/v10060293.
2
Incidence of neuropsychiatric side effects of efavirenz in HIV-positive treatment-naïve patients in public-sector clinics in the Eastern Cape.在东开普省公共部门诊所中,初治的HIV阳性患者使用依非韦伦后出现神经精神副作用的发生率。
South Afr J HIV Med. 2016 Jun 30;17(1):452. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v17i1.452. eCollection 2016.
3
Efavirenz or nevirapine in three-drug combination therapy with two nucleoside or nucleotide-reverse transcriptase inhibitors for initial treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral-naïve individuals.
依非韦伦或奈韦拉平与两种核苷类或核苷酸类逆转录酶抑制剂联合用于初治抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV感染者的初始治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 10;12(12):CD004246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004246.pub4.
4
Efavirenz-Based Regimens in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.初治HIV感染患者中基于依非韦伦的治疗方案:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0124279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124279. eCollection 2015.
5
Immuno-haematologic and virologic responses and predictors of virologic failure in HIV-1 infected adults on first-line antiretroviral therapy in Cameroon.喀麦隆接受一线抗逆转录病毒治疗的 HIV-1 感染成年人的免疫血液学和病毒学反应以及病毒学失败的预测因素。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2014 Jan 30;3(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2049-9957-3-5.
6
Nevirapine-based regimens in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于奈韦拉平的方案在 HIV 感染的抗逆转录病毒初治患者中的应用:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 7;8(10):e76587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076587. eCollection 2013.
7
Outcomes for efavirenz versus nevirapine-containing regimens for treatment of HIV-1 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.依非韦伦与含奈韦拉平方案治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒 1 型感染的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e68995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068995. Print 2013.
8
Comparative effectiveness of efavirenz-based antiretroviral regimens in resource-limited settings.基于依非韦伦的抗逆转录病毒疗法在资源有限环境中的比较效果。
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Mar;1(2):157-170. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.6.
9
Immune Reconstitution During the First Year of Antiretroviral Therapy of HIV-1-Infected Adults in Rural Burkina Faso.布基纳法索农村地区感染HIV-1的成年人接受抗逆转录病毒治疗第一年期间的免疫重建
Open AIDS J. 2012;6:16-25. doi: 10.2174/1874613601206010016. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
10
Adult combination antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons from Botswana and future challenges.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的成人抗逆转录病毒联合疗法:来自博茨瓦纳的经验教训及未来挑战。
HIV Ther. 2009 Sep 1;3(5):501-526. doi: 10.2217/hiv.09.35.