• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健中符合伦理的决策制定:对传统做法的挑战。

Ethically defensible decision-making in health care: challenges to traditional practice.

作者信息

Bailey Susan

机构信息

Deakin University.

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2002;25(2):27-31. doi: 10.1071/ah020027.

DOI:10.1071/ah020027
PMID:12046151
Abstract

The concept of paternalism is deeply entrenched in health care. Decision-making about health care can be extremely difficult at times, and many competing interests may influence the outcomes. However, ethically defensible practice aligns itself with acknowledging the patient's prima facie right to be treated as an autonomous individual. This includes the patient's right to make informed decisions or to decide that other(s), such as the close family, should make decisions on his or her behalf.

摘要

家长式作风的概念在医疗保健领域根深蒂固。医疗保健决策有时可能极其困难,许多相互冲突的利益可能会影响结果。然而,符合道德规范的做法是承认患者享有被视为自主个体的初步权利。这包括患者做出明智决策的权利,或者决定让他人(如近亲)代表自己做出决策的权利。

相似文献

1
Ethically defensible decision-making in health care: challenges to traditional practice.医疗保健中符合伦理的决策制定:对传统做法的挑战。
Aust Health Rev. 2002;25(2):27-31. doi: 10.1071/ah020027.
2
Matching physician practice style to patient informational issues and decision-making preferences. An approach to patient autonomy and medical paternalism issues in clinical practice.使医生的执业风格与患者的信息需求和决策偏好相匹配。临床实践中处理患者自主权和医疗家长主义问题的一种方法。
Arch Fam Med. 1994 Sep;3(9):760-3; discussion 764. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.9.760.
3
[What good? From benevolence to autonomy principles].[何为善?从仁爱原则到自主原则]
Bull Cancer. 2009 Jul-Aug;96(7):769-75. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2009.0909.
4
Ethics for the pediatrician: autonomy, beneficence, and rights.儿科医生的伦理:自主性、善行和权利。
Pediatr Rev. 2010 Jun;31(6):252-5. doi: 10.1542/pir.31-6-252.
5
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.尊重患有慢性精神疾病的女性在避孕决策方面的自主权。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;44(7):671-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.7.671.
6
Patients'-best-interests standard trumps autonomous health-care decisions: paternalism vs self-determination.患者最佳利益标准优先于自主医疗决策:家长主义与自我决定权之争。
Chest. 2010 Oct;138(4):1021-2; author reply 1022-3. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0939.
7
The concept of futility in health care decision making.医疗保健决策中的无效性概念。
Nurs Ethics. 2004 Jan;11(1):77-83. doi: 10.1191/0969733004ne668oa.
8
Ethically justified guidelines for family planning interventions to prevent pregnancy in female patients with chronic mental illness.针对患有慢性精神疾病的女性患者预防怀孕的计划生育干预措施的伦理合理指南。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul;167(1):19-25. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)91618-4.
9
Quandary at the crossroads: paternalism versus advocacy surrounding end-of-treatment decisions.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 1995 Jul-Aug;12(4):43-6. doi: 10.1177/104990919501200414.
10
"Nudge" in the clinical consultation--an acceptable form of medical paternalism?临床会诊中的“助推”——一种可接受的医学家长主义形式?
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Apr 17;15:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-31.