• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使医生的执业风格与患者的信息需求和决策偏好相匹配。临床实践中处理患者自主权和医疗家长主义问题的一种方法。

Matching physician practice style to patient informational issues and decision-making preferences. An approach to patient autonomy and medical paternalism issues in clinical practice.

作者信息

Peters R M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY.

出版信息

Arch Fam Med. 1994 Sep;3(9):760-3; discussion 764. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.9.760.

DOI:10.1001/archfami.3.9.760
PMID:7987509
Abstract

The movement away from traditional medical paternalism toward increased patient autonomy presents difficult practical and ethical problems for the physician treating the wide variety of patients seen in clinical practice. A review of the literature supports the concept of matching the physician's practice style with both patient informational issues and the patient's desire to actively participate in medical decision making. Studies also support that this matching principle not only improves physician-patient relationships but is ethically defensible and results in improved clinical outcomes. This article presents such a patient-physician match model as an aid to the practicing clinician.

摘要

从传统的医学家长式作风向增强患者自主权的转变,给治疗临床实践中形形色色患者的医生带来了棘手的实际问题和伦理问题。文献综述支持将医生的执业风格与患者的信息需求以及患者积极参与医疗决策的愿望相匹配的理念。研究还表明,这种匹配原则不仅能改善医患关系,在伦理上站得住脚,还能带来更好的临床结果。本文提出了这样一种医患匹配模式,以帮助临床执业医生。

相似文献

1
Matching physician practice style to patient informational issues and decision-making preferences. An approach to patient autonomy and medical paternalism issues in clinical practice.使医生的执业风格与患者的信息需求和决策偏好相匹配。临床实践中处理患者自主权和医疗家长主义问题的一种方法。
Arch Fam Med. 1994 Sep;3(9):760-3; discussion 764. doi: 10.1001/archfami.3.9.760.
2
The ideal of shared decision making between physicians and patients.医生与患者共同决策的理想状态。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991 Mar;1(1):28-47. doi: 10.1353/ken.0.0084.
3
Controversies in oncologist-patient communication: a nuanced approach to autonomy, culture, and paternalism.肿瘤学家与患者沟通中的争议:自主性、文化和家长主义的细微差别方法。
Oncology (Williston Park). 2012 Jan;26(1):37-43, 46.
4
Paternalism modernised.现代化的家长式作风。
J Med Ethics. 1985 Dec;11(4):184-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.4.184.
5
Four models of the physician-patient relationship.医患关系的四种模式。
JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221-6.
6
Rational non-interventional paternalism: why doctors ought to make judgments of what is best for their patients.合理的非干涉性家长主义:为何医生应该对什么对患者最有利做出判断。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):327-31. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.6.327.
7
Autonomy and paternalism in medicine.医学中的自主性与家长主义
Med J Aust. 1993;159(11-12):797-802. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb141355.x.
8
Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice.医生的建议与患者自主权:在医生权力与患者选择之间寻求平衡。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Nov 1;125(9):763-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-9-199611010-00010.
9
Informing the patient about a fatal disease: from paternalism to autonomy--the Jewish view.告知患者患致命疾病:从家长式作风到自主权——犹太教观点
Cancer Invest. 2004;22(6):949-53. doi: 10.1081/cnv-200039687.
10
Can paternalism be modernised?家长式作风能够现代化吗?
J Med Ethics. 1986 Sep;12(3):133-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.12.3.133.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Shared Decision-Making Model for Diabetic Patients: A Qualitative Study.为糖尿病患者开发共享决策模型:一项定性研究。
Galen Med J. 2020 Jun 28;10:e1735. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v10i0.1735. eCollection 2021.
2
Randomised feasibility trial and embedded qualitative process evaluation of a new intervention to facilitate the involvement of older patients with multimorbidity in decision-making about their healthcare during general practice consultations: the VOLITION study protocol.一项新干预措施的随机可行性试验及嵌入式定性过程评估,该干预措施旨在促进患有多种疾病的老年患者在全科诊疗咨询过程中参与自身医疗保健决策:VOLITION研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 26;6:161. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00699-7. eCollection 2020.
3
How patient-generated health data and patient-reported outcomes affect patient-clinician relationships: A systematic review.
患者生成的健康数据和患者报告的结果如何影响医患关系:系统评价。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Dec;26(4):2689-2706. doi: 10.1177/1460458220928184. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
4
Interventions for involving older patients with multi-morbidity in decision-making during primary care consultations.在初级保健会诊期间让患有多种疾病的老年患者参与决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 28;2019(10):CD013124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013124.pub2.
5
Creating space to discuss end-of-life issues in cancer care.为讨论癌症护理临终问题创造空间。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Feb;102(2):216-222. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
6
Internists' dilemmas in their interactions with chronically ill patients; A comparison of their interaction strategies and dilemmas in two different medical contexts.内科医生在与慢性病患者互动中的困境;在两种不同医疗环境下的互动策略和困境比较。
PLoS One. 2018 May 30;13(5):e0194133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194133. eCollection 2018.
7
Older patients and their GPs: shared decision making in enhancing trust.老年患者及其全科医生:增强信任中的共同决策
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Nov;64(628):e709-18. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682297.
8
Sex preferences in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of the patient-physician discussion.心血管检查中的性别偏好:医患讨论的贡献。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):680-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12169.
9
Truth-telling and patient diagnoses.告知真相与患者诊断
J Med Ethics. 2001 Jun;27(3):192-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.3.192.