Yoshihama Mieko
University of Michigan School of Social Work, Ann Arbor 48109-1106, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2002 Jun;30(3):429-52. doi: 10.1023/A:1015393204820.
People are rarely passive, and battered women are no exception. This study investigated the types of coping strategies women of Japanese descent (both Japan-born and U.S.-born) chose and their perceived effectiveness in dealing with their partners' violence. Japan-born respondents were significantly less likely to use "active" strategies and perceived them to be less effective than did U.S.-born respondents For the Japan-born, the more effective they perceived "active" strategies, the higher their psychological distress, whereas the more effective they perceived "passive" strategies, the lower their psychological distress. In contrast, for the U.S.-born, the higher the perceived effectiveness of "active" strategies, the lower their psychological distress, and the perceived effectiveness of "passive" strategies had little effect on their psychological distress. The complex relationship between individuals' country of birth, the choice and perceived effectiveness of coping strategies, and psychological distress calls for increased attention to the role of culture in studies of coping and domestic violence.
人很少是被动的,受虐妇女也不例外。本研究调查了日裔女性(包括在日本出生和在美国出生的)所选择的应对策略类型以及她们在应对伴侣暴力时所感知到的有效性。在日本出生的受访者使用“积极”策略的可能性显著低于在美国出生的受访者,并且他们认为“积极”策略的效果不如美国出生的受访者。对于在日本出生的人来说,他们认为“积极”策略越有效,心理困扰就越高,而他们认为“消极”策略越有效,心理困扰就越低。相比之下,对于在美国出生的人来说,“积极”策略的感知有效性越高,心理困扰就越低,而“消极”策略的感知有效性对他们的心理困扰影响不大。个人出生国家、应对策略的选择和感知有效性以及心理困扰之间的复杂关系,要求在应对和家庭暴力研究中更多地关注文化的作用。