O'Suilleabhain Padraig E, Dewey Richard B
Clinical Center for Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, TX, USA.
Arch Neurol. 2002 Jun;59(6):986-9. doi: 10.1001/archneur.59.6.986.
Excessive daytime somnolence is a common report among patients who have Parkinson disease (PD). The relative contributions of disease severity and of the various dopaminergic drugs are unclear.
To separate and quantify the contributions of disease markers and drug doses.
Patients seen during a 7-month period at a center for movement disorders completed the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Treatment subgroups were compared. The relationship to sedation of age; dopaminergic drug classes and doses; Hoehn and Yahr stage; duration of disease; total score on the motor subsection of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale; and the presence or absence of dementia, depression, or hallucinations was calculated using simple and multiple regression and t tests.
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores were higher among patients with PD (mean [SD], 10.8 [5.3]; n = 368) compared with patients with other neurological disorders (mean, 8.5 [5.1]; n = 243; P<.001). A model containing the Hoehn and Yahr stage, levodopa dose, and use of a dopamine agonist was the best at predicting the total score of Epworth Sleepiness Scale in patients who have PD, but accounted for only 9% of the interindividual variance. The parameter estimates (SE) corresponded to a 1.02 (0.03)-point increase per Hoehn and Yahr stage, a 0.14 (0.06)-point increase per 100-mg increase in levodopa dose over 24 hours, and a 2.33 (0.57)-point increase with use of an agonist. There was no statistically significant dose response for agonists. No statistically significant difference in sedation among the commonly used dopamine agonists was found.
Somnolence in patients with PD, which is on average 25% higher than in other neurological diseases, is related to PD stage, levodopa dose, and the use of a dopamine agonist. However, most of the variability in sedation levels in patients with PD as well as in controls is the result of, as yet, unidentified factors.
日间过度嗜睡是帕金森病(PD)患者的常见主诉。疾病严重程度和各种多巴胺能药物的相对作用尚不清楚。
区分并量化疾病标志物和药物剂量的作用。
在一家运动障碍中心为期7个月的时间里就诊的患者完成了爱泼华嗜睡量表。对各治疗亚组进行比较。采用简单和多元回归以及t检验计算年龄、多巴胺能药物类别和剂量、Hoehn和Yahr分期、病程、统一帕金森病评定量表运动部分总分与镇静作用之间的关系,以及是否存在痴呆、抑郁或幻觉。
与其他神经系统疾病患者(均值,8.5[5.1];n = 243)相比,PD患者的爱泼华嗜睡量表评分更高(均值[标准差],10.8[5.3];n = 368;P<0.001)。包含Hoehn和Yahr分期、左旋多巴剂量以及多巴胺激动剂使用情况的模型在预测PD患者爱泼华嗜睡量表总分方面效果最佳,但仅占个体间差异的9%。参数估计值(标准误)对应于每升高一个Hoehn和Yahr分期增加1.02(0.03)分,24小时内左旋多巴剂量每增加100 mg增加0.14(0.06)分,使用激动剂增加2.33(0.57)分。激动剂不存在统计学显著的剂量反应。在常用的多巴胺激动剂之间未发现镇静作用有统计学显著差异。
PD患者的嗜睡程度平均比其他神经系统疾病高25%,与PD分期、左旋多巴剂量以及多巴胺激动剂的使用有关。然而,PD患者以及对照组镇静水平的大多数变异性是由尚未明确的因素导致的。