Suppr超能文献

急诊科临床工作人员的沟通负担。

Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department.

作者信息

Coiera Enrico W, Jayasuriya Rohan A, Hardy Jennifer, Bannan Aiveen, Thorpe Max E C

机构信息

Centre for Health Informatics, University of New South Wales, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2002 May 6;176(9):415-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04482.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To measure communication loads on clinical staff in an acute clinical setting, and to describe the pattern of informal and formal communication events, Australia.

DESIGN

Observational study.

SETTING

Two emergency departments, one rural and one urban, in New South Wales hospitals, between June and July 1999.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve clinical staff members, comprising six nurses and six doctors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time involved in communication; number of communication events, interruptions, and overlapping communications; choice of communication channel; purpose of communication.

RESULTS

35 hours and 13 minutes were observed, and 1286 distinct communication events were identified, representing 36.5 events per person per hour (95% CI, 34.5-38.5). A third of communication events (30.6%) were classified as interruptions, giving a rate of 11.15 interruptions per hour for all subjects; 10% of communication time involved two or more concurrent conversations; and 12.7% of all events involved formal information sources such as patients' medical records. Face-to-face conversation accounted for 82%. While medical staff asked for information slightly less frequently than nursing staff (25.4% v 30.9%), they received information much less frequently (6.6% v 16.2%).

CONCLUSION

Our results support the need for communication training in emergency departments and other similar workplaces. The combination of interruptions and multiple concurrent tasks may produce clinical errors by disrupting memory processes. About 90% of the information transactions observed involved interpersonal exchanges rather than interaction with formal information sources. This may put a low upper limit on the potential for improving information processes by introducing electronic medical records.

摘要

目的

测量澳大利亚急性临床环境中临床工作人员的沟通负荷,并描述非正式和正式沟通事件的模式。

设计

观察性研究。

地点

1999年6月至7月期间,新南威尔士州医院的两个急诊科,一个在农村,一个在城市。

参与者

12名临床工作人员,包括6名护士和6名医生。

主要观察指标

沟通所花费的时间;沟通事件、中断和重叠沟通的数量;沟通渠道的选择;沟通目的。

结果

观察时长为35小时13分钟,共识别出1286个不同的沟通事件,即每人每小时36.5个事件(95%可信区间,34.5 - 38.5)。三分之一的沟通事件(30.6%)被归类为中断,所有受试者的中断率为每小时11.15次;10%的沟通时间涉及两个或更多同时进行的对话;所有事件的12.7%涉及诸如患者病历等正式信息来源。面对面交谈占82%。虽然医务人员询问信息的频率略低于护理人员(25.4%对30.9%),但他们接收信息的频率要低得多(6.6%对16.2%)。

结论

我们的结果支持在急诊科和其他类似工作场所进行沟通培训的必要性。中断和多项同时进行的任务相结合可能会扰乱记忆过程,从而导致临床错误。观察到的信息交流中约90%涉及人际交流,而非与正式信息来源的互动。这可能会给引入电子病历改善信息流程的潜力设定一个较低的上限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验