Suppr超能文献

Comparison of tablets and paper discs for antibiotic sensitivity testing.

作者信息

Brown D F, Kothari D

出版信息

J Clin Pathol. 1975 Dec;28(12):983-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.12.983.

Abstract

The value of tablets and paper discs as reservoirs of antimicrobial agents for use in sensitivity testing was compared. Antibiotics that were unstable in paper discs showed no demonstrable loss of activity in tablets over a period of 50 days under adverse storage conditions. The antibiotic content of commercially prepared tablets is very high in comparison with the accepted content of paper discs used in Britain, but not all of the agent is released from tablets during tests. Comparison of the size of zones of inhibition around tablets and standard paper discs indicated that the amount of the various agents released from the tablets varied between 2-6% and 69% of the stated content. In tests of the sensitivity of a range of common pathogenic organisms, the results obtained with the tablet method--when interpreted as recommended by the manufacturer--were generally similar to those obtained with a paper disc method commonly used in British laboratories. In 47% of tests with aminoglycoside antibiotics, however, strains sensitive by the disc method were 'intermediate' or resistant by the tablet method. As with paper discs, it was necessary to press the tablets on to the medium. With adjustment of the 'effective antibiotic content of tablets to bring it into line with the accepted content in paper discs, the stability of antibiotics in the tablets might make them an acceptable alternative to paper discs.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison of tablets and paper discs for antibiotic sensitivity testing.
J Clin Pathol. 1975 Dec;28(12):983-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.12.983.
3
Comparison of antibiotic discs from different sources.
J Clin Pathol. 1975 Oct;28(10):779-83. doi: 10.1136/jcp.28.10.779.
5
An accurate diffusion method for determining bacterial sensitivity to antibiotics.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Jul;34(1):73-81. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.1.73.
7
Comparison of antibiotic susceptibility results obtained with Adatab and disc methods.
J Clin Pathol. 1984 Sep;37(9):1059-65. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.9.1059.

引用本文的文献

1
Flavobacterium erciyesense sp. nov., a putative non-pathogenic fish symbiont.
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Nov;203(9):5783-5792. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02566-2. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
4
Use of sensitivity discs as primary antibiotic standards in MIC determination.
J Clin Pathol. 1978 Sep;31(9):855-8. doi: 10.1136/jcp.31.9.855.
5
Tablet sensitivity testing on pathogenic fungi.
J Clin Pathol. 1979 Jul;32(7):719-22. doi: 10.1136/jcp.32.7.719.

本文引用的文献

2
Drug resistance as influenced by inactivated sensitivity discs.
Appl Microbiol. 1968 Apr;16(4):656-8. doi: 10.1128/am.16.4.656-658.1968.
3
Standardising, manufacture and control of neo-sensitabs.
Acta Clin Belg. 1973;28(3):139-49. doi: 10.1080/17843286.1973.11716866.
4
Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study.
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1971;217:Suppl 217:1+.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验