Frankish C James, Kwan Brenda, Ratner Pamela A, Higgins Joan Wharf, Larsen Craig
Institute of Health Promotion Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2002 May;54(10):1471-80. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00135-6.
Citizen participation has been included as part of health reform, often in the form of lay health authorities. In Canada, these authorities are variously known as regional health boards or councils. A set of challenges is associated with citizen participation in regional health authorities. These challenges relate to: differences in opinion about whether there should be citizen participation at all; differences in perception of the levels and processes of participation; differences in opinion with respect to the roles and responsibilities of health authority members; differences in opinion about the appropriate composition of the authorities; differences in opinion about the requisite skills and attributes of health authority members; having a good support base (staff, good information, board development); understanding and operationalizing various roles of the board (governance and policy setting) versus the board staff (management and administration); difficulties in ensuring the accountability of the health authorities; and measuring the results of the work and decisions of the health authorities. Despite these challenges, regional health authorities are gaining support as both theoretically sound and pragmatically based approaches to health-system reform. This review of the above challenges suggests that each of the concerns remains a significant threat to meaningful public participation.
公民参与已被纳入卫生改革的一部分,通常是以非专业卫生当局的形式。在加拿大,这些当局有不同的称呼,如区域卫生委员会或理事会。公民参与区域卫生当局存在一系列挑战。这些挑战涉及:对于是否应该有公民参与存在意见分歧;对参与程度和过程的认知差异;关于卫生当局成员的角色和责任的意见分歧;关于当局适当组成的意见分歧;关于卫生当局成员所需技能和特质的意见分歧;拥有良好的支持基础(工作人员、优质信息、委员会发展);理解并实施委员会的各种角色(治理和政策制定)与委员会工作人员的角色(管理和行政)之间的差异;确保卫生当局问责制的困难;以及衡量卫生当局工作和决策的结果。尽管存在这些挑战,但区域卫生当局作为卫生系统改革在理论上合理且基于务实的方法正获得支持。对上述挑战的审视表明,每一个问题仍然是对有意义的公众参与的重大威胁。