Suppr超能文献

在某种程度上是本质主义的:关于自然种类范畴结构的信念。

Essentialist to some degree: beliefs about the structure of natural kind categories.

作者信息

Kalish Charles W

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2002 Apr;30(3):340-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03194935.

Abstract

Previous research has provided conflicting evidence regarding the hypothesis that people are essentialists. Much of the evidence in favor of essentialism is based on demonstrating that categories are thought to have absolute membership. Although the hypothesis is often framed as an absolute claim about all categories of a certain type (e.g., natural kinds), it has generally been tested by making relative comparisons with a select sample. The present study assesses judgments of absolute structure across a range of categories. A further condition for essentialism is that the criteria for category identity be seen as objective rather than conventional. The results of three experiments based on these considerations do not provide support for essentialist claims. Few categories were judged to have essentialist structure, in terms of either absolute membership or objective criteria. Results are discussed in light of an alternative to the essentialist hypothesis that emphasizes a pragmatic view of categories.

摘要

先前的研究对于“人是本质主义者”这一假设给出了相互矛盾的证据。许多支持本质主义的证据是基于证明类别被认为具有绝对的成员资格。尽管该假设通常被表述为对某一特定类型的所有类别(例如自然种类)的绝对断言,但它通常是通过与一个选定的样本进行相对比较来进行测试的。本研究评估了一系列类别中的绝对结构判断。本质主义的另一个条件是类别身份的标准应被视为客观的而非约定俗成的。基于这些考虑的三个实验结果并不支持本质主义的主张。就绝对成员资格或客观标准而言,很少有类别被判断具有本质主义结构。根据强调类别实用主义观点的本质主义假设的替代观点对结果进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验