Suppr超能文献

语义分类中的置信度和分级性:肯定在某种程度上是人为的,也许完全是自然的。

Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural.

作者信息

Estes Zachary

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Dec;11(6):1041-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196734.

Abstract

Artifacts tend to be categorized in a graded (i.e., continuous) manner, whereas natural categorization tends to be absolute (i.e., discrete). This domain-specific categorization is assumed to reflect a domain difference in representation. However, another tenable but untested explanation is that graded categorization arises from uncertainty, which is greater in artifact categories than in natural categories. Confidence ratings were used as an index of certainty in two experiments that tested whether confidence in category judgments can explain the apparent gradedness of those categories. Both experiments revealed that artifact categories were more graded and were judged with greater confidence than were natural categories. Confidence and gradedness were negatively correlated within both domains. Thus, confidence did indeed predict gradedness within the artifact and natural domains but failed to predict the difference in gradedness between those domains. There is more to gradedness than just uncertainty.

摘要

人工制品倾向于以分级(即连续)的方式进行分类,而自然分类倾向于绝对(即离散)。这种特定领域的分类被认为反映了表征中的领域差异。然而,另一种合理但未经检验的解释是,分级分类源于不确定性,人工制品类别中的不确定性比自然类别中的更大。在两项实验中,信心评级被用作确定性的指标,这两项实验测试了类别判断中的信心是否能够解释这些类别的明显分级性。两项实验均表明,人工制品类别比自然类别更具分级性,并且在判断时信心更高。在两个领域中,信心和分级性均呈负相关。因此,信心确实能够预测人工制品领域和自然领域内的分级性,但无法预测这两个领域之间分级性的差异。分级性不仅仅是不确定性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验