Kogi Kazutaka
Institute for Science of Labour, Kawasaki, Japan.
Ind Health. 2002 Apr;40(2):121-33. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.40.121.
There is a growing trend in re-orientating occupational health research towards risk management. Such a trend is accelerated by the increasing attention to occupational safety and health management systems. The trend, also seen in many Asian countries, is offering new opportunities for strengthening primary prevention. Useful examples are provided from recent work improvement projects dealing with technology transfer, small workplaces and rural areas. Common features of both these work improvement projects and accepted occupational risk management principles are reviewed based on recent experiences in Asian countries. Such features seem highly relevant in examining the occupational health research strategies. These experiences clearly show that locally adjusted procedures for risk assessment and control must be developed. There are new research needs concerning (a) the effective ways to encourage voluntary control at the workplace; (b) practical methods for local risk assessment; and (c) the types of participatory steps leading to continual improvements in the varying local context. Criteria of action-oriented research that can contribute to more effective risk control in different settings are discussed. Six relevant criteria may be mentioned: (a) adaptive risk management; (b) work/risk relationships; (c) action-oriented risk assessment; (d) use of collective expertise; (e) participation of local people; and (f) mutual learning. It appears crucial to stimulate research into the practical risk control procedures adjusted to the local situation.
职业健康研究重新定位为风险管理的趋势日益明显。对职业安全与健康管理体系的日益关注加速了这一趋势。这种趋势在许多亚洲国家也很明显,为加强初级预防提供了新机遇。近期涉及技术转让、小型工作场所和农村地区的工作改进项目提供了有益范例。基于亚洲国家的近期经验,对这些工作改进项目和公认的职业风险管理原则的共同特征进行了审视。这些特征在审视职业健康研究策略方面似乎高度相关。这些经验清楚地表明,必须制定适合当地情况的风险评估和控制程序。出现了一些新的研究需求,涉及:(a)鼓励工作场所自愿控制的有效方法;(b)当地风险评估的实用方法;(c)在不同当地背景下能带来持续改进的参与式步骤类型。讨论了有助于在不同环境中实现更有效风险控制的行动导向型研究标准。可提及六个相关标准:(a)适应性风险管理;(b)工作/风险关系;(c)行动导向型风险评估;(d)集体专业知识的运用;(e)当地民众的参与;(f)相互学习。推动针对当地情况调整的实际风险控制程序的研究似乎至关重要。