• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过颞下注射进行球周麻醉时阿替卡因与布比卡因/利多卡因的比较。

Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia by inferotemporal injection.

作者信息

Allman K G, Barker L L, Werrett G C, Gouws P, Sturrock G D, Wilson I H

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2002 May;88(5):676-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.5.676.

DOI:10.1093/bja/88.5.676
PMID:12067005
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Articaine is a novel amide local anaesthetic with a shorter duration of action than prilocaine.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind study we compared the efficacy of 2% articaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 with a mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery using a single inferotemporal injection. Eighty-two patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups to receive peribulbar anaesthesia with 6-7 ml of articaine or a bupivacaine/lidocaine mixture. Both solutions contained hyaluronidase 30 iu ml(-1). Ocular movement was scored at 2 min intervals up to 10 min, at the end of surgery and at time of discharge from hospital. Time to readiness for surgery and any complications (proptosis, chemosis, pain) were recorded.

RESULTS

The articaine group demonstrated a rapid onset of peribulbar block with mean time (SD) to readiness for surgery of 4.2 (4.5) min compared with 7.2 (5.7) min in the bupivacaine/lidocaine group (P=0.0095). The block obtained in the articaine group was dense with eye movement scores at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 min all significantly reduced (P<0.01 at each interval). There was also a faster offset of the block in the articaine group (P=0.0009). There was no difference in incidence of minor complications between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Two per cent articaine is safe and effective for peribulbar anaesthesia by inferotemporal injection and is a suitable alternative to the traditional mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine.

摘要

背景

阿替卡因是一种新型酰胺类局部麻醉药,其作用持续时间比丙胺卡因短。

方法

在一项随机双盲研究中,我们比较了含1:200,000肾上腺素的2%阿替卡因与含1:200,000肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因和2%利多卡因混合物用于白内障手术颞下象限单次球周麻醉的效果。82例患者被随机分配至两组之一,接受6 - 7毫升阿替卡因或布比卡因/利多卡因混合物进行球周麻醉。两种溶液均含有30 iu ml⁻¹透明质酸酶。每隔2分钟对眼球运动进行评分,直至10分钟、手术结束时及出院时。记录手术准备就绪时间及任何并发症(眼球突出、结膜水肿、疼痛)。

结果

阿替卡因组球周阻滞起效迅速,手术准备就绪的平均时间(标准差)为4.2(4.5)分钟,而布比卡因/利多卡因组为7.2(5.7)分钟(P = 0.0095)。阿替卡因组获得的阻滞效果浓密,在2、4、6、8和10分钟时的眼球运动评分均显著降低(每个时间间隔P < 0.01)。阿替卡因组阻滞消退也更快(P = 0.0009)。两组间轻微并发症发生率无差异。

结论

2%阿替卡因经颞下象限注射用于球周麻醉安全有效,是0.5%布比卡因和2%利多卡因传统混合物的合适替代药物。

相似文献

1
Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia by inferotemporal injection.通过颞下注射进行球周麻醉时阿替卡因与布比卡因/利多卡因的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2002 May;88(5):676-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.5.676.
2
Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia.阿替卡因与布比卡因/利多卡因用于单眼内眦球周麻醉的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Oct;87(4):584-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.4.584.
3
Articaine versus lidocaine plus bupivacaine for peribulbar anaesthesia in cataract surgery.用于白内障手术球周麻醉的阿替卡因与利多卡因加布比卡因的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Feb;92(2):231-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh043.
4
Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for sub-Tenon's anaesthesia in cataract extraction.阿替卡因与布比卡因/利多卡因用于白内障摘除术中球后麻醉的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2004 Feb;92(2):228-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeh044.
5
Comparison of 4% articaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine/2% lidocaine mixture for sub-Tenon's anaesthesia in phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a randomised controlled trial.4%阿替卡因与0.5%左旋布比卡因/2%利多卡因混合液用于白内障超声乳化手术球周麻醉的比较:一项随机对照试验
Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;92(4):496-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.115576. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
6
Comparison of 1% ropivacaine with 0.75% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine for peribulbar anaesthesia.1%罗哌卡因与0.75%布比卡因和2%利多卡因用于球周麻醉的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):89-91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013388.
7
Comparison of L-bupivacaine 0.75% and lidocaine 2% with bupivacaine 0.75% and lidocaine 2% for peribulbar anaesthesia.0.75%左旋布比卡因与2%利多卡因联合0.75%布比卡因与2%利多卡因用于球周麻醉的比较。
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Apr;90(4):512-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg097.
8
[Peribulbar anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia with facial nerve block. Techniques, local anesthetics and additives, akinesia and sensory block, complications].[球周麻醉与球后麻醉联合面神经阻滞。技术、局部麻醉药及添加剂、运动阻滞和感觉阻滞、并发症]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Feb;204(2):75-89. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035503.
9
Ropivacaine for peribulbar anesthesia.用于球周麻醉的罗哌卡因。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;24(4):337-40. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(99)90108-6.
10
Peribulbar anaesthesia: a double-blind comparison of three local anaesthetic solutions.
Anaesthesia. 1999 Jan;54(1):67-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00639.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Articaine: a review of its use for local and regional anesthesia.阿替卡因:局部及区域麻醉应用综述
Local Reg Anesth. 2012;5:23-33. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S16682. Epub 2012 Jun 5.