Pisegna Joseph R
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Administration, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA.
Crit Care Med. 2002 Jun;30(6 Suppl):S356-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200206001-00003.
The more potent and longer-lasting inhibition of gastric acid secretion provided by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as compared with histamine-2-receptor antagonists is caused in large part by differences in their mechanism of action. PPIs block histamine-2-, gastrin-, and cholinergic-mediated sources of acid production and inhibit gastric secretion at the final common pathway of the H+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase proton pump. In contrast, histamine-2-receptor antagonists cannot block receptor sites other than those mediated by histamine. It seems that the rapid loss of acid suppression activity by the histamine-2-receptor antagonists may be attributed to tolerance. Such tolerance has not occurred in patients receiving PPIs because these agents are irreversible inhibitors of the H+/K+ adenosine triphosphatase proton pump. For these reasons, patients who have acid-related disorders that require high levels of acid suppression do not respond well to intravenous histamine-2-receptor antagonists and would be excellent candidates for intravenous PPI therapy. Candidates for intravenous PPIs also include patients who cannot receive oral PPIs and those who may need the higher acid suppression therapy provided by the intravenous rather than the oral route. Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of intravenous pantoprazole in maintaining adequate control of gastric acid output during the switch from oral to intravenous therapy in patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease or the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Intragastric administration of solutions prepared from oral PPIs has been used as an alternative to the intravenous route in critical care settings. However, decreased bioavailability may limit the value of intragastric delivery of PPIs because of the high frequency of gastric emptying problems in critically ill patients.
与组胺-2受体拮抗剂相比,质子泵抑制剂(PPI)对胃酸分泌的抑制作用更强且持续时间更长,这在很大程度上是由它们作用机制的差异所致。PPI阻断组胺-2、胃泌素和胆碱能介导的产酸来源,并在H+/K+ 三磷酸腺苷质子泵的最终共同途径抑制胃酸分泌。相比之下,组胺-2受体拮抗剂不能阻断组胺介导以外的受体位点。组胺-2受体拮抗剂酸抑制活性的快速丧失似乎可归因于耐受性。接受PPI的患者未出现这种耐受性,因为这些药物是H+/K+ 三磷酸腺苷质子泵的不可逆抑制剂。由于这些原因,患有需要高度抑制胃酸的酸相关疾病的患者对静脉注射组胺-2受体拮抗剂反应不佳,而可能是静脉注射PPI治疗的理想人选。静脉注射PPI的候选者还包括不能接受口服PPI的患者以及可能需要通过静脉而非口服途径提供的更高酸抑制治疗的患者。临床研究已证明,在患有严重胃食管反流病或卓-艾综合征的患者从口服治疗转换为静脉治疗期间,静脉注射泮托拉唑在维持胃酸分泌的充分控制方面的疗效。在重症监护环境中,由口服PPI制备的溶液的胃内给药已被用作静脉途径的替代方法。然而,生物利用度降低可能会限制PPI胃内给药的价值,因为重症患者胃排空问题的发生率很高。