Wu A W, Jacobson K L, Frick K D, Clark R, Revicki D A, Freedberg K A, Scott-Lennox J, Feinberg J
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205-2690, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2002 May;11(3):273-82. doi: 10.1023/a:1015240103565.
Brief utility measures are needed in clinical trials in addition to existing descriptive measures of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We examined the reliability and validity of the EuroQol (EQ-SD) and MOS-HIV and their responsiveness to HIV-related clinical events.
Subjects with advanced HIV disease (CD4 < 100) were enrolled in a randomized trial for CMV prophylaxis (n = 990). The EQ-5D includes a weighted sum of five domains (EQ-5D Index) and a visual analog scale (EQ-VAS). The MOS-HIV has 10 subscales and physical (PHS) and mental health summary scores (MHS). Construct validity of the EQ-5D was tested based on hypothesized relationships to subscales of the MOS-HIV. Relative precision and responsiveness to adverse experiences and opportunistic infections (Ols) were compared for the two instruments.
Mean age of the patients was 38, 94% were male, 80% white, and 7% had injected drugs. Mean baseline scores for EQ-5D Index and EQ-VAS were 0.80 and 76.0, respectively, 28 and 4% reported maximum scores. Mean MOS-HIV subscales score ranged from 55 (role) to 84 (cognitive); mean PHS and MHS were 47.4 and 49.5, respectively. Correlations between MOS-HIV subscales and EQ-5D Index ranged from 0.45 (role) to 0.63 (pain); correlations with EQ-VAS ranged from 0.33 (cognitive) to 0.66 (health perceptions). Correlations between MOS-HIV PHS and MHS with EQ-5D Index were 0.61 and 0.58; and with EQ-VAS, 0.57 and 0.60, respectively. Responsiveness to adverse experiences was highest for MOS-HIV pain and PHS (effect sizes = 0.9 and 0.4); pain had the highest relative precision (2.4) for adverse experiences: EQ-VAS had the greatest relative precision (1.6) for developing an OI.
In these patients with advanced HIV disease. EQ-5D showed good construct validity, but there may be a ceiling effect for its EQ-5D Index component. EQ-5D was less responsive to adverse events than the MOS-HIV. However, the EQ-VAS was most sensitive to developing an OI and is likely to be a useful measure of HRQOL for generating QALYs in cost-utility studies involving patients with advanced HIV disease.
除了现有的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)描述性指标外,临床试验还需要简短实用的指标。我们研究了欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-SD)和HIV特异性简明健康调查量表(MOS-HIV)的可靠性和有效性,以及它们对HIV相关临床事件的反应性。
将晚期HIV疾病患者(CD4<100)纳入一项预防巨细胞病毒(CMV)的随机试验(n = 990)。EQ-5D包括五个领域的加权总和(EQ-5D指数)和一个视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)。MOS-HIV有10个分量表以及生理(PHS)和心理健康总结得分(MHS)。基于与MOS-HIV分量表的假设关系,对EQ-5D的结构效度进行了测试。比较了这两种工具对不良经历和机会性感染(OI)的相对精度和反应性。
患者的平均年龄为38岁,94%为男性,80%为白人,7%曾注射过毒品。EQ-5D指数和EQ-VAS的平均基线得分分别为0.80和76.0,分别有28%和4%的患者报告得分为最高分。MOS-HIV分量表的平均得分范围为55(角色)至84(认知);PHS和MHS的平均分分别为47.4和49.5。MOS-HIV分量表与EQ-5D指数的相关性范围为0.45(角色)至0.63(疼痛);与EQ-VAS的相关性范围为0.33(认知)至0.66(健康感知)。MOS-HIV的PHS和MHS与EQ-5D指数的相关性分别为0.61和0.58;与EQ-VAS的相关性分别为0.57和0.60。MOS-HIV的疼痛分量表和PHS对不良经历的反应性最高(效应量分别为0.9和0.4);疼痛分量表对不良经历的相对精度最高(2.4);EQ-VAS对发生OI的相对精度最高(1.6)。
在这些晚期HIV疾病患者中,EQ-5D显示出良好的结构效度,但其EQ-5D指数部分可能存在天花板效应。EQ-5D对不良事件的反应性低于MOS-HIV。然而,EQ-VAS对发生OI最敏感,在涉及晚期HIV疾病患者的成本效用研究中,它可能是一种有用的HRQOL指标,用于生成质量调整生命年(QALY)。