Sohn Patricia M, Loveland Cook Cynthia A
Jewish Hospital College of Nursing and Allied Health, Washington University Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jul;39(1):9-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02238.x.
With the increasing use of complementary alternative treatments by the general public in the United States of America (USA), it is critical that nurse practitioners have the most up-to-date information about the use and safety of these modalities. A strong knowledge base is crucial in delivering competent and culturally sensitive care, yet the level and source of nurse practitioner knowledge in this area is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the level and source of nurse practitioner knowledge of complementary alternative health care practices, as well as their referral practices involving these treatments.
Using a cross-sectional descriptive research design, a sample of 151 nurse practitioners from Missouri and Oregon completed an adapted version of Sapp's self-administered survey that explored these issues. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the adapted instrument demonstrated good face validity, test-retest reliability (kappa = 0.81) and internal consistency reliability were 0.90 and 0.92 for two subscales with continuous response categories.
Eighty-three percent of the nurse practitioners recommended complementary alternative treatments to their patients with the most frequent being massage therapy, chiropractic care, acupuncture or acupressure, nutritional therapy and herbal treatment. However, only 24% reported that formal nurse practitioner education was a source of knowledge about these treatments. Instead, over 60% relied on their personal experiences for this knowledge, as well as lay and professional journals.
Nearly 9 out of 10 nurse practitioners recommend the use of complementary alternative therapies to patients, but their source of knowledge is not derived from professional education. Attention needs to be given to increasing content about complementary alternative therapies in formal academic programs, professional conferences and in-service education opportunities.
在美国,随着普通民众对补充替代疗法的使用日益增加,执业护士掌握这些疗法的最新使用情况和安全性信息至关重要。强大的知识基础对于提供称职且具有文化敏感性的护理至关重要,但该领域执业护士的知识水平和来源在很大程度上尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查执业护士对补充替代医疗保健实践的知识水平和来源,以及他们涉及这些治疗的转诊实践。
采用横断面描述性研究设计,来自密苏里州和俄勒冈州的151名执业护士样本完成了Sapp自行管理的调查问卷的改编版,该问卷探讨了这些问题。对改编后的工具进行心理测量特性评估,结果显示其具有良好的表面效度,重测信度(kappa = 0.81),对于两个具有连续反应类别的子量表,内部一致性信度分别为0.90和0.92。
83%的执业护士向患者推荐补充替代疗法,最常推荐的是按摩疗法、脊椎按摩疗法、针灸或指压疗法、营养疗法和草药治疗。然而,只有24%的人报告说正规的执业护士教育是关于这些治疗的知识来源。相反,超过60%的人依靠个人经验以及非专业和专业期刊来获取这方面的知识。
近十分之九的执业护士向患者推荐使用补充替代疗法,但他们的知识来源并非来自专业教育。需要关注在正规学术课程、专业会议和在职教育机会中增加有关补充替代疗法的内容。