• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复性敲击和绘画动作中显性和隐性时间的分离。

Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements.

作者信息

Zelaznik Howard N, Spencer Rebecca M C, Ivry Richard B

机构信息

Department of Health and Kinesiology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Jun;28(3):575-88. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.3.575.

DOI:10.1037//0096-1523.28.3.575
PMID:12075889
Abstract

Four experiments explored the hypothesis that temporal processes may be represented and controlled explicitly or implicitly. Tasks hypothesized to require explicit timing were duration discrimination, tapping, and intermittent circle drawing. In contrast, it was hypothesized that timing control during continuous circle drawing does not rely on an explicit temporal representation; rather, temporal control is an emergent property of other control processes (i.e., timing is controlled implicitly). Temporal consistency on the tapping and intermittent drawing tasks was related, and performance on both of these tasks was correlated with temporal acuity on an auditory duration discrimination task. However, timing variability of these 3 tasks was not correlated with timing variability of continuous circle drawing. These results support the hypothesized distinction between explicit and implicit temporal representations.

摘要

四项实验探究了时间进程可能以显性或隐性方式被表征和控制这一假设。被假定需要显性计时的任务包括时长辨别、敲击以及间歇性画圈。相比之下,假定连续画圈过程中的计时控制并不依赖于显性的时间表征;相反,时间控制是其他控制过程的一种涌现属性(即计时是被隐性控制的)。敲击任务和间歇性画圈任务的时间一致性是相关的,并且这两项任务的表现都与听觉时长辨别任务中的时间敏锐度相关。然而,这三项任务的计时变异性与连续画圈的计时变异性并无关联。这些结果支持了关于显性和隐性时间表征之间假定差异的观点。

相似文献

1
Dissociation of explicit and implicit timing in repetitive tapping and drawing movements.重复性敲击和绘画动作中显性和隐性时间的分离。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Jun;28(3):575-88. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.3.575.
2
Weber (slope) analyses of timing variability in tapping and drawing tasks.对敲击和绘图任务中时间变异性的韦伯(斜率)分析。
J Mot Behav. 2003 Dec;35(4):371-81. doi: 10.1080/00222890309603157.
3
Coordination dynamics and attentional costs of continuous and discontinuous bimanual circle drawing movements.连续和不连续双手画圈动作的协调动力学与注意力成本
Hum Mov Sci. 2008 Oct;27(5):823-37. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2007.11.003. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
4
The cerebellum and event timing.小脑与事件计时
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Dec;978:302-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb07576.x.
5
Timing variability in circle drawing and tapping: probing the relationship between event and emergent timing.画圈和敲击任务中的时间变异性:探究事件时间与新兴时间之间的关系。
J Mot Behav. 2005 Sep;37(5):395-403. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.37.5.395-403.
6
The context of temporal processing is represented in the multidimensional relationships between timing tasks.时间处理的背景是通过计时任务之间的多维关系来体现的。
PLoS One. 2008 Sep 9;3(9):e3169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003169.
7
Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: further evidence against timing as a general-purpose ability.以偏好速度进行敲击和画圈动作时的时间精度不相关:进一步证明时间感知并非一种通用能力。
J Mot Behav. 2000 Jun;32(2):193-9. doi: 10.1080/00222890009601370.
8
Timing processes are correlated when tasks share a salient event.当任务共享一个显著事件时,时间进程是相关的。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Dec;36(6):1565-75. doi: 10.1037/a0020380.
9
Testing the co-existence of two timing strategies for motor control in a unique task: The synchronisation spatial-tapping task.在一项独特任务中测试运动控制的两种计时策略的共存:同步空间轻拍任务。
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Oct;43:45-60. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
10
Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control.敲击和绘图任务之间时间一致性的相关性:反对运动控制单一时间进程的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Oct;25(5):1316-30. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.5.1316.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in the movement phase condition and sensory inputs on temporal synchronization and continuation during bilateral foot-tapping tasks.双侧足部敲击任务中运动阶段条件和感觉输入在时间同步与连续性方面的差异。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 30;19:1518230. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1518230. eCollection 2025.
2
A Second Introduction to the Neurobiology of Interval Timing.间隔定时的神经生物学的第二次介绍。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1455:3-23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-60183-5_1.
3
Auditory feedback decreases timing variability for discontinuous and continuous motor tasks in autistic adults.
听觉反馈可降低自闭症成年人在非连续和连续运动任务中的时间变异性。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2024 Apr 16;18:1379208. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1379208. eCollection 2024.
4
Sensorimotor synchronization with visual, auditory, and tactile modalities.感觉运动同步与视觉、听觉和触觉模态。
Psychol Res. 2023 Oct;87(7):2204-2217. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01801-3. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
5
Spatial distances affect temporal prediction and interception.空间距离影响时间预测和拦截。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 22;12(1):15786. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18789-2.
6
The neural bases for timing of durations.持续时间计时的神经基础。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022 Nov;23(11):646-665. doi: 10.1038/s41583-022-00623-3. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
7
Evaluation of Explicit Motor Timing Ability in Young Tennis Players.年轻网球运动员明确运动计时能力的评估
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 24;12:687302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.687302. eCollection 2021.
8
Prestimulus inhibition of eye movements reflects temporal expectation rather than time estimation.刺激前的眼球运动抑制反映的是时间预期而非时间估计。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Aug;83(6):2473-2485. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02319-9. Epub 2021 May 12.
9
Examining modifications of execution strategies during a continuous task.检查连续任务中执行策略的修改。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 1;11(1):4829. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84369-5.
10
Attention Guides the Motor-Timing Strategies in Finger-Tapping Tasks When Moving Fast and Slow.在快速和慢速手指敲击任务中,注意力引导运动计时策略。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 25;11:574396. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574396. eCollection 2020.