Dione Mariama, Delevoye-Turrell Yvonne
SCALab, UMR CNRS 9193, France; Univ Lille, BP 60149, 59653 Villeneuve d'ascq Cedex, France.
SCALab, UMR CNRS 9193, France; Univ Lille, BP 60149, 59653 Villeneuve d'ascq Cedex, France.
Hum Mov Sci. 2015 Oct;43:45-60. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
The control of rhythmic action sequences may involve two distinct timing strategies, i.e., event-based and emergent timing, which are usually revealed through finger-tapping and circle-drawing tasks, respectively. There is a lively debate concerning the possibility of coexistence of the two modes of timing for the execution of a single task. If one considers emergent timing as simply an absence of explicit representation of a time interval, then by definition, the two modes of timing cannot coexist. However, if one considers that emergent timing engages control of another motor parameter, e.g., a control of movement through space rather than time, then the possibility of coexistence needs to be reassessed. In the present study, we designed a hybrid of finger-tapping and circle-drawing tasks for which the demands for space and time control were present at the same time in order to reassess the coexistence hypothesis. Seventy-eight participants performed a spatial-tapping task in which finger taps were to be produced in synchrony with a regular metronome to 6 visual targets presented around a virtual circle. The metronome set ten distinct tempi (1100-300 ms). Using autocorrelation analyses on timing variables, we show that motor timing was event-based at slow tempi and emergent at faster tempi. Through an analysis of the trajectory, we confirm that an increase in the spatial control of movement took place congruently with a switch from event-based to emergent timing modes. At these fast tempi, timing and spatial errors were correlated but only at the specific target location for which a dynamical anchor point was revealed. Hence, we conclude that the coding of emergent timing has a spatial nature from which emerge timing regularities. This spatio-temporal strategy insures the performance of sequential motor actions when cognitive effort is too high for the use of pure event-based timing strategies.
有节奏动作序列的控制可能涉及两种不同的计时策略,即基于事件的计时和涌现计时,通常分别通过手指敲击和画圈任务来揭示。关于执行单一任务时这两种计时模式共存的可能性存在激烈的争论。如果将涌现计时简单地视为时间间隔没有明确表征,那么根据定义,这两种计时模式不能共存。然而,如果认为涌现计时涉及对另一个运动参数的控制,例如对空间中运动的控制而非对时间的控制,那么就需要重新评估共存的可能性。在本研究中,我们设计了一种手指敲击和画圈任务的混合任务,其中对空间和时间控制的要求同时存在,以便重新评估共存假说。78名参与者执行了一项空间敲击任务,在该任务中,手指敲击要与节拍器同步,以敲击围绕虚拟圆圈呈现的6个视觉目标。节拍器设置了10种不同的节奏(1100 - 300毫秒)。通过对计时变量进行自相关分析,我们表明,在较慢节奏下运动计时是基于事件的,而在较快节奏下是涌现的。通过对轨迹的分析,我们证实,随着从基于事件的计时模式向涌现计时模式的转变,运动的空间控制也相应增加。在这些较快节奏下,计时和空间误差是相关的,但仅在揭示了动态锚点的特定目标位置相关。因此,我们得出结论,涌现计时的编码具有空间性质,从中涌现出计时规律。当认知努力过高而无法使用纯粹基于事件的计时策略时,这种时空策略确保了连续运动动作的执行。