Rose S, Bisson J, Churchill R, Wessely S
West Berkshire Traumatic Stress Service, Berkshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK., Erleigh Road Clinic, 25 Erleigh Road, Reading, Berks, UK, RG1 5LR.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD000560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000560.
Over approximately the last last fifteen years early psychological interventions such as psychological 'debriefing' have been increasingly used to treat psychological trauma. While these intervention have become popular and their use spread to several settings - efficacy had largely not been tested empirically. In 1997 a systematic review of single session psychological "debriefing" was undertaken and this subsequently became a protocol and Cochrane Review published in 1998 (Issue2). This update forms the first substantive update of the original review.
To assess the effectiveness of brief psychological debriefing for the management of psychological distress after trauma, and the prevention of post traumatic stress disorder.
Electronic searching of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychLit, PILOTS, Biosis, Pascal, Occ. Safety and Health,SOCIOFILE, CINAHL, PSYCINFO, PSYNDEX, SIGLE, LILACS, CCTR, CINAHL, NRR, Hand search of Journal of Traumatic Stress. Contact with leading researchers.
The inclusion criteria for all randomized studies was that they should focus on persons recently (one month or less) exposed to a traumatic event, should consist of a single session only, and that the intervention involve some form of emotional processing/ventilation by encouraging recollection/reworking of the traumatic event accompanied by normalisation of emotional reaction to the event.
11 trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Quality was generally poor. Data from two trials could not be synthesised. Two trials involved the use of the intervention in an obstetric setting.
Single session individual debriefing did not reduce psychological distress nor prevent the onset of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Those who received the intervention showed no significant short term (3-5 months) in the risk of PTSD (odds ratio 1.22 (95% ci 0.60 to 2.46 )). At one year one trial reported that there was a significantly increased risk of PTSD in those receiving debriefing (odds ratio 2.88 (1.11 to 7.53))odds ratio 95%). There was also no evidence that debriefing reduced general psychological morbidity, depression or anxiety.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no current evidence that psychological debriefing is a useful treatment for the prevention of post traumatic stress disorder after traumatic incidents. Compulsory debriefing of victims of trauma should cease.
在过去大约十五年间,诸如心理“疏导”之类的早期心理干预措施越来越多地被用于治疗心理创伤。虽然这些干预措施已变得流行,其应用也扩展到了多个领域,但其实效在很大程度上尚未经过实证检验。1997年对单次心理“疏导”进行了系统评价,随后该评价成为一项方案,并于1998年发表了Cochrane系统评价(第2期)。本次更新构成了对原评价的首次实质性更新。
评估简短心理疏导对创伤后心理困扰的管理及创伤后应激障碍预防的有效性。
对MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsychLit、PILOTS、Biosis、Pascal、职业安全与健康、SOCIOFILE、CINAHL、PSYCINFO、PSYNDEX、SIGLE、LILACS、CCTR、CINAHL、NRR进行电子检索,手工检索《创伤应激杂志》。与主要研究人员联系。
所有随机研究的纳入标准为,研究应聚焦于近期(一个月或更短时间)遭受创伤事件的人群,应仅包含单次干预,且干预应通过鼓励回忆/重新处理创伤事件并使对该事件的情绪反应正常化,涉及某种形式的情绪处理/宣泄。
11项试验符合纳入标准。质量总体较差。两项试验的数据无法进行综合分析。两项试验涉及在产科环境中使用该干预措施。
单次个体疏导既未减轻心理困扰,也未预防创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的发生。接受干预的人群在创伤后应激障碍风险方面,短期内(3 - 5个月)未显示出显著差异(优势比1.22(95%可信区间0.60至2.46))。在一年时,一项试验报告称,接受疏导的人群中创伤后应激障碍风险显著增加(优势比2.88(1.11至7.53)(95%可信区间))。也没有证据表明疏导能降低总体心理发病率、抑郁或焦虑。
目前没有证据表明心理疏导是预防创伤事件后创伤后应激障碍的有效治疗方法。对创伤受害者进行强制疏导应该停止。