Schumacher H Ralph, Boice Judith A, Daikh David I, Mukhopadhyay Saurabh, Malmstrom Kerstin, Ng Jennifer, Tate Guillermo A, Molina Javier
Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 22;324(7352):1488-92. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7352.1488.
To assess the safety and efficacy of etoricoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor, in comparison with indometacin in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis.
Randomised, double blind, active comparator controlled trial.
43 outpatient study centres in 11 countries.
142 men and eight women (75 patients per treatment group) aged 18 years or over presenting with clinically diagnosed acute gout within 48 hours of onset.
Etoricoxib 120 mg administered orally once daily versus indometacin 50 mg administered orally three times daily, both for 8 days.
Patients' assessment of pain in the study joint over days 2 to 5 (primary end point); investigators' and patients' global assessments of response to treatment and tenderness of the study joint (key secondary end points).
Etoricoxib showed efficacy comparable to indometacin. Patients' assessment of pain in the study joint (0-4 point Likert scale, "no pain" to "extreme pain") over days 2 to 5 showed a least squares mean change from baseline of -1.72 (95% confidence interval -1.90 to -1.55) for etoricoxib and -1.83 (-2.01 to -1.65) for indometacin. The difference between treatment groups met prespecified comparability criteria. All other efficacy end points, including those reflecting reduction in inflammation and analgesia, provided corroborative evidence of comparable efficacy. Significant pain relief was evident at the first measurement, 4 hours after the first dose of treatment. Prespecified safety analyses revealed that drug related adverse experiences occurred significantly less frequently with etoricoxib (22.7%) than with indometacin (46.7%) (P=0.003), although overall adverse experience rates were similar between the two treatment groups.
Etoricoxib 120 mg once daily provides rapid and effective treatment for acute gouty arthritis comparable to indometacin 50 mg three times daily. Etoricoxib was generally safe and well tolerated in this study.
比较选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂依托考昔与吲哚美辛治疗急性痛风性关节炎的安全性和有效性。
随机、双盲、活性对照试验。
11个国家的43个门诊研究中心。
142名男性和8名女性(每个治疗组75名患者),年龄18岁及以上,在发病48小时内出现临床诊断的急性痛风。
依托考昔120毫克,每日口服一次;吲哚美辛50毫克,每日口服三次,均治疗8天。
患者在第2至5天对研究关节疼痛的评估(主要终点);研究者和患者对治疗反应及研究关节压痛的整体评估(关键次要终点)。
依托考昔显示出与吲哚美辛相当的疗效。在第2至5天,患者对研究关节疼痛的评估(0至4分李克特量表,从“无疼痛”到“极度疼痛”)显示,依托考昔组从基线的最小二乘均值变化为-1.72(95%置信区间-1.90至-1.55),吲哚美辛组为-1.83(-2.01至-1.65)。治疗组之间的差异符合预先设定的可比性标准。所有其他疗效终点,包括反映炎症减轻和镇痛的终点,均提供了疗效相当的佐证证据。在首次给药后4小时的首次测量时,即可明显缓解疼痛。预先设定的安全性分析显示,依托考昔的药物相关不良事件发生率(22.7%)显著低于吲哚美辛(46.7%)(P = 0.003),尽管两个治疗组的总体不良事件发生率相似。
每日一次服用120毫克依托考昔治疗急性痛风性关节炎的疗效迅速且与每日三次服用50毫克吲哚美辛相当。在本研究中,依托考昔总体安全且耐受性良好。