Suppr超能文献

依托考昔和吲哚美辛治疗痛风性关节炎的疗效和安全性是否相似?一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Do etoricoxib and indometacin have similar effects and safety for gouty arthritis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Lin Tzu-Min, Chi Jia-En, Chang Chi-Ching, Kang Yi-No

机构信息

Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China,

Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2018 Dec 19;12:83-91. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S186004. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gout, a common medical condition that causes pain, can be treated by painkillers and anti-inflammatories. Indometacin and etoricoxib are two such drugs. However, no synthesized evidence exists comparing etoricoxib with indometacin in treating patients with gout.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library without restrictions on language or publication date for potential randomized clinical trials comparing etoricoxib with indometacin for gout. The meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Search results yielded 313 references from six electronic databases, four of which met the eligibility criteria. These four were randomized clinical trials, and they involved a total of 609 patients with gouty arthritis. No significant differences were observed in pain score change, tenderness, or swelling between etoricoxib and indometacin; the mean differences were -0.05 (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.10), -0.06 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.05), and -0.04 (95% CI, -0.17 to 0.09). However, the pooled data revealed that significantly fewer overall adverse events occurred in the etoricoxib group (n=105, 33.5%) than in the indometacin group (n=130, 44.1%) and the risk ratio was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.62-0.94).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis revealed that etoricoxib and indometacin have similar effects on pain relief. However, etoricoxib has a significantly lower risk of adverse events than does indometacin, especially digestive system-related adverse events.

摘要

背景

痛风是一种常见的引发疼痛的病症,可用止痛药和抗炎药进行治疗。吲哚美辛和依托考昔就是两种此类药物。然而,尚无综合证据比较依托考昔与吲哚美辛治疗痛风患者的效果。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Ovid MEDLINE、Web of Science、ScienceDirect和Cochrane图书馆,对语言和出版日期均无限制,以查找比较依托考昔与吲哚美辛治疗痛风的潜在随机临床试验。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。

结果

检索结果从六个电子数据库中得到313篇参考文献,其中四篇符合纳入标准。这四篇均为随机临床试验,共纳入609例痛风性关节炎患者。依托考昔和吲哚美辛在疼痛评分变化、压痛或肿胀方面未观察到显著差异;平均差异分别为-0.05(95%CI,-0.21至0.10)、-0.06(95%CI,-0.18至0.05)和-0.04(95%CI,-0.17至0.09)。然而,汇总数据显示,依托考昔组(n = 105,33.5%)发生的总体不良事件明显少于吲哚美辛组(n = 130,44.1%),风险比为0.77(95%CI,0.62 - 0.94)。

结论

我们的荟萃分析表明,依托考昔和吲哚美辛在缓解疼痛方面效果相似。然而,依托考昔发生不良事件的风险明显低于吲哚美辛,尤其是与消化系统相关的不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b43/6305166/e5958e9ceca2/jpr-12-083Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验