Shull Richard L, Gaynor Scott T, Grimes Julie A
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 27402-6164, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):211-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-211.
Rats obtained food pellets by nose poking a lighted key, the illumination of which alternated every 50 s during a session between blinking and steady, signaling either a relatively rich (60 per hour) or relatively lean (15 per hour) rate of reinforcement. During one training condition, all the reinforcers in the presence of the rich-reinforcement signal were response dependent (i.e., a variable-interval schedule); during another condition only 25% were response dependent (i.e., a variable-time schedule operated concurrently with a variable-interval schedule). An extinction session followed each training block. For both kinds of training schedule, and consistent with prior results, response rate was more resistant to extinction in the presence of the rich-reinforcement signal than in the presence of the lean-reinforcement signal. Analysis of interresponse-time distributions from baseline showed that differential resistance to extinction was not related to baseline differences in the rate of initiating response bouts or in the length of bouts. Also, bout-initiation rate (like response rate) was most resistant to extinction in the presence of the rich-reinforcement signal. These results support the proposal of behavioral momentum theory (e.g., Nevin & Grace, 2000) that resistance to extinction in the presence of a discriminative stimulus is determined more by the stimulus-reinforcer (Pavlovian) than by the stimulus-response-reinforcer (operant) contingency.
大鼠通过用鼻子戳亮着的按键来获取食物颗粒,在一次实验过程中,按键的照明每50秒在闪烁和稳定之间交替,分别表示相对丰富(每小时60次)或相对稀少(每小时15次)的强化率。在一种训练条件下,丰富强化信号出现时的所有强化都是反应依赖型的(即可变间隔时间表);在另一种条件下,只有25%是反应依赖型的(即可变时间时间表与可变间隔时间表同时运行)。每个训练阶段后紧接着进行一次消退实验。对于这两种训练时间表,与先前的结果一致,在丰富强化信号存在时,反应率比在稀少强化信号存在时更能抵抗消退。对基线期反应间隔时间分布的分析表明,消退的差异抗性与发起反应阵的速率或阵的长度的基线差异无关。此外,阵发起率(与反应率一样)在丰富强化信号存在时最能抵抗消退。这些结果支持了行为动量理论(例如,内文和格雷斯,2000)的提议,即在辨别性刺激存在时对消退的抗性更多地由刺激-强化物(巴甫洛夫式)决定,而不是由刺激-反应-强化物(操作性) contingency决定。 (注:原文中“stimulus-response-reinforcer (operant) contingency”最后这个“contingency”翻译可能不太准确,结合语境推测大概是“意外情况、偶然因素”之类的意思,但整体句子逻辑可能是“刺激-反应-强化物(操作性)之间的关联”,因原文此处表述稍显模糊,所以译文可能存在一定理解偏差。)