Shahan Timothy A, Magee Adam, Dobberstein Andria
Department of Psychology, Utah State University, Logan 84322, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Nov;80(3):273-93. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-273.
Observing responses produce contact with discriminative stimuli and have been considered analogous to attending. Many studies have examined the effects of reinforcement rate on the resistance to change of simple operant behavior, but nothing is known about the resistance to change of observing. Two experiments examined the effects of primary reinforcement rate on the resistance to change of observing behavior of pigeons. In Experiment 1, a multiple schedule of observing-response procedures was arranged. In a rich component, observing responses produced stimuli correlated with a high rate of random-interval (RI) reinforcement or extinction. In a lean component, observing responses produced stimuli correlated with a lower rate of RI reinforcement or extinction. In both components, observing responses produced the multiple-schedule stimuli on a fixed-interval 0.75-s schedule. In Experiment 2, a similar procedure was used, but observing in the rich and lean components produced schedule-correlated stimuli on an RI 15-s schedule. Observing in the rich component occurred at a higher rate and was more resistant to disruptions produced by presession feeding and response-independent food deliveries during intercomponent intervals. Despite more frequent observing during unsignaled periods of extinction than unsignaled periods of RI reinforcement, observing during extinction periods was less resistant to change. In addition, replicating the usual result, responding on the food key was generally more resistant to change in the presence of stimuli associated with higher reinforcement rates. These results suggest that quantitative descriptions of resistance to change derived with simple food-maintained responding may be applicable to observing, and perhaps by extension, to attending.
观察反应会与辨别性刺激产生接触,并且被认为类似于注意。许多研究考察了强化速率对简单操作性行为改变抗性的影响,但对于观察的改变抗性却一无所知。两项实验考察了初级强化速率对鸽子观察行为改变抗性的影响。在实验1中,安排了一个观察-反应程序的多重时间表。在丰富成分中,观察反应产生与高随机间隔(RI)强化率或消退相关的刺激。在贫乏成分中,观察反应产生与较低RI强化率或消退相关的刺激。在两个成分中,观察反应都以固定间隔0.75秒的时间表产生多重时间表刺激。在实验2中,使用了类似的程序,但在丰富和贫乏成分中的观察以RI 15秒的时间表产生与时间表相关的刺激。在丰富成分中的观察发生率更高,并且对成分间间隔期间的会前喂食和与反应无关的食物投放所产生的干扰更具抗性。尽管在无信号消退期的观察比无信号RI强化期更频繁,但在消退期的观察对改变的抗性更小。此外,重复通常的结果,在与更高强化率相关的刺激存在时,食物按键反应通常对改变更具抗性。这些结果表明,从简单的食物维持反应得出的改变抗性的定量描述可能适用于观察,并且也许通过扩展,适用于注意。