Luna G M, Manini E, Danovaro R
Institute of Marine Sciences, Marine Biology Section, Faculty of Science, University of Ancona, Via Brecce Bianche, 60131 Ancona, Italy.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jul;68(7):3509-13. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3509-3513.2002.
It is now universally recognized that only a portion of aquatic bacteria is actively growing, but quantitative information on the fraction of living versus dormant or dead bacteria in marine sediments is completely lacking. We compared different protocols for the determination of the dead, dormant, and active bacterial fractions in two different marine sediments and at different depths into the sediment core. Bacterial counts ranged between (1.5 +/- 0.2) x 10(8) cells g(-1) and (53.1 +/- 16.0) x 10(8) cells g(-1) in sandy and muddy sediments, respectively. Bacteria displaying intact membrane (live bacterial cells) accounted for 26 to 30% of total bacterial counts, while dead cells represented the most abundant fraction (70 to 74%). Among living bacterial cells, nucleoid-containing cells represented only 4% of total bacterial counts, indicating that only a very limited fraction of bacterial assemblage was actively growing. Nucleoid-containing cells increased with increasing sediment organic content. The number of bacteria responsive to antibiotic treatment (direct viable count; range, 0.3 to 4.8% of the total bacterial number) was significantly lower than nucleoid-containing cell counts. An experiment of nutrient enrichment to stimulate a response of the dormant bacterial fraction determined a significant increase of nucleoid-containing cells. After nutrient enrichment, a large fraction of dormant bacteria (6 to 11% of the total bacterial number) was "reactivated." Bacterial turnover rates estimated ranged from 0.01 to 0.1 day(-1) but were 50 to 80 times higher when only the fraction of active bacteria was considered (on average 3.2 day(-1)). Our results suggest that the fraction of active bacteria in marine sediments is controlled by nutrient supply and availability and that their turnover rates are at least 1 order of magnitude higher than previously reported.
现在人们普遍认识到,只有一部分水生细菌在积极生长,但关于海洋沉积物中活细菌与休眠或死亡细菌比例的定量信息却完全缺失。我们比较了不同的方案,用于测定两种不同海洋沉积物以及沉积物岩芯不同深度处的死亡、休眠和活跃细菌比例。在沙质沉积物和泥质沉积物中,细菌数量分别在(1.5±0.2)×10⁸个细胞/克至(53.1±16.0)×10⁸个细胞/克之间。显示完整细胞膜的细菌(活细菌细胞)占细菌总数的26%至30%,而死细胞占比最大(70%至74%)。在活细菌细胞中,含有类核的细胞仅占细菌总数的4%,这表明只有非常有限的一部分细菌群落正在积极生长。含有类核的细胞数量随着沉积物有机含量的增加而增加。对抗生素处理有反应的细菌数量(直接活菌计数;范围为细菌总数的0.3%至4.8%)显著低于含有类核的细胞计数。一项营养富集实验以刺激休眠细菌部分的反应,结果显示含有类核的细胞数量显著增加。营养富集后,很大一部分休眠细菌(占细菌总数的6%至11%)被“重新激活”。估计的细菌周转率在0.01至0.1天⁻¹之间,但仅考虑活跃细菌部分时,周转率要高50至80倍(平均为3.2天⁻¹)。我们的结果表明,海洋沉积物中活跃细菌的比例受营养供应和可利用性的控制,并且它们的周转率比先前报道的至少高1个数量级。