Suppr超能文献

视觉单词识别中的邻域效应:促进性还是抑制性?

Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: facilitatory or inhibitory?

作者信息

Snodgrass J G, Mintzer M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University, NY 10003.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 1993 Mar;21(2):247-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03202737.

Abstract

In five experiments, in which subjects were to identify a target word as it was gradually clarified, we manipulated the target's frequency of occurrence in the language and its neighborhood size--the number of words that can be constructed from a target word by changing one letter, while preserving letter position. In Experiments 1-4, visual identification performance to screen-fragmented words was measured. In Experiments 1 and 2, we used the ascending method of limits, whereas Experiments 3 and 4 presented a fixed-level fragment. In Experiment 1, there was no relation between overall accuracy and neighborhood size for words between three and six letters in length. However, more errors of commission (guesses) were made for high-neighborhood words and more errors of omission (blanks) were made for low-neighborhood words. Letter errors within guesses occurred at serial positions having many neighbors, and these positions were also likely to contain consonants rather than vowels. In Experiment 2, a small facilitatory effect of neighborhood size on both high- and low-frequency words was found. In contrast, in Experiments 3 and 4, using the same set of words, inhibitory effects of neighborhood size, but only for low-frequency words, were found. Experiment 5, using a speeded identification task, showed results parallel to those of Experiments 3 and 4. We suggest that whether neighborhood effects are facilitatory or inhibitory depends on whether feedback allows subjects to disconfirm initial hypotheses that the target is a high-frequency neighbor.

摘要

在五项实验中,实验对象要在目标单词逐渐清晰的过程中识别它,我们操控了目标单词在语言中的出现频率及其邻域大小——通过改变一个字母同时保持字母位置,由目标单词构建出的单词数量。在实验1 - 4中,测量了对屏幕碎片化单词的视觉识别表现。在实验1和2中,我们使用了极限递增法,而实验3和4呈现的是固定水平的片段。在实验1中,对于长度在三到六个字母之间的单词,总体准确率与邻域大小之间没有关联。然而,邻域大的单词出现更多的错误肯定(猜测),邻域小的单词出现更多的错误否定(空白)。猜测中的字母错误出现在有许多邻居的序列位置,并且这些位置也更可能包含辅音而非元音。在实验2中,发现邻域大小对高频和低频单词都有小的促进作用。相比之下,在实验3和4中,使用同一组单词,发现邻域大小有抑制作用,但仅针对低频单词。实验5使用了快速识别任务,其结果与实验3和4的结果相似。我们认为邻域效应是促进性还是抑制性取决于反馈是否允许实验对象否定目标是高频邻居的初始假设。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验