• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

周边无干扰:词汇判断和语义分类中不存在抑制性周边效应。

No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization.

作者信息

Forster K I, Shen D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 May;22(3):696-713. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.696.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.696
PMID:8656152
Abstract

The effect of neighborhood density on visual word recognition was found to be facilitatory for words but inhibitory for nonwords in 3 lexical-decision experiments. However, the facilitation virtually disappeared when the task was changed to semantic categorization (animal vs. nonanimal), despite the presence of a strong frequency effect. None of these experiments showed a consistent inhibitory effect of a higher frequency neighbor. The absence of inhibitory effects suggests that competition does not play a key role in visual word recognition. The data also suggest that the neighborhood density effect is not an access effect but is a task-dependent effect instead.

摘要

在3项词汇判断实验中,研究发现邻里密度对视觉单词识别的影响对单词具有促进作用,但对非单词具有抑制作用。然而,当任务改为语义分类(动物与非动物)时,尽管存在强烈的频率效应,但这种促进作用几乎消失了。这些实验均未显示出高频邻词具有一致的抑制作用。抑制作用的缺失表明竞争在视觉单词识别中并不起关键作用。数据还表明,邻里密度效应不是一种通达效应,而是一种任务依赖效应。

相似文献

1
No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization.周边无干扰:词汇判断和语义分类中不存在抑制性周边效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 May;22(3):696-713. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.3.696.
2
Orthographic neighborhood effects in perceptual identification and semantic categorization tasks: a test of the multiple read-out model.知觉识别和语义分类任务中的正字法邻域效应:多重读出模型的一项检验
Percept Psychophys. 1999 Nov;61(8):1537-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03213116.
3
A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.简单谈一谈“非词”:在词汇判断任务中,非词的频率、语义近邻密度和正字法到语义一致性效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jan;47(1):157-183. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000819. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Effects of masked repetition priming and orthographic neighborhood in visual recognition of words.掩蔽重复启动效应和正字法邻域在单词视觉识别中的作用。
Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Aug;83(1):179-86. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.83.1.179.
5
Orthographic neighborhood and concreteness effects in the lexical decision task.词汇判断任务中的正字法邻域效应和具体性效应。
Brain Lang. 2004 Nov;91(2):252-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2004.03.001.
6
Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: facilitatory or inhibitory?视觉单词识别中的邻域效应:促进性还是抑制性?
Mem Cognit. 1993 Mar;21(2):247-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03202737.
7
Blocking by word frequency and neighborhood density in visual word recognition: a task-specific response criteria account.视觉单词识别中词频和邻域密度的阻碍作用:基于特定任务反应标准的解释
Mem Cognit. 2004 Oct;32(7):1090-102. doi: 10.3758/bf03196884.
8
Neighborhood frequency effects and letter visibility in visual word recognition.视觉单词识别中的邻域频率效应与字母可见性
Percept Psychophys. 1992 Jan;51(1):49-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03205073.
9
Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.词汇和语义处理的级联模型与非级联模型:三元组效应
Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1106-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03194328.
10
Distinguishing common and task-specific processes in word identification: a matter of some moment?区分单词识别中的常见过程和特定任务过程:这是一个重要问题吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Mar;27(2):514-44. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.514.

引用本文的文献

1
New Insights Into Slow Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Analyses of Visual Word Recognition in Arabic.慢速阅读的新见解:阿拉伯语视觉单词识别的行为和电生理分析
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Aug;62(4):e70223. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70223.
2
Visual word identification beyond common words: The role of font and letter case in brand names.超越常见词汇的视觉词识别:字体和字母大小写在品牌名称中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1673-1686. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01570-3. Epub 2024 May 9.
3
Processing difficulty while reading words with neighbors is not due to increased foveal load: Evidence from eye movements.
阅读带邻字的单词时的加工困难并非源于增加的中央凹负荷:来自眼动的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 May;86(4):1360-1374. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02880-z. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
4
The Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size and the Influence of Individual Differences in Linguistic Skills During the Recognition of Chinese Words.正字法邻域大小对汉字识别的影响及语言技能个体差异的作用
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 10;12:727894. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727894. eCollection 2021.
5
Eye Movement Measures of Within-Language and Cross-Language Activation During Reading in Monolingual and Bilingual Children and Adults: A Focus on Neighborhood Density Effects.单语和双语儿童及成人阅读过程中语言内和跨语言激活的眼动测量:聚焦邻域密度效应
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 27;12:674007. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.674007. eCollection 2021.
6
Accessibility and Historical Change: An Emergent Cluster Led to Become .可及性与历史变迁:一个新兴集群引领着走向……(原文表述似乎不完整,翻译可能存在一定局限性)
Front Psychol. 2021 May 26;12:662884. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662884. eCollection 2021.
7
Interactions in the neighborhood: Effects of orthographic and phonological neighbors on N400 amplitude.邻域中的交互作用:正字法和语音邻域对N400波幅的影响。
J Neurolinguistics. 2017 Feb;41:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
8
The impact of emotional content on pseudoword recognition.情绪内容对假词识别的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):2980-2996. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01454-6. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
9
The inhibitory effect of word neighborhood size when reading with central field loss is modulated by word predictability and reading proficiency.中心视野缺损患者阅读时,词的近邻大小的抑制作用受词的可预测性和阅读熟练程度的调节。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 11;10(1):21792. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78420-0.
10
Friends in Low-Entropy Places: Orthographic Neighbor Effects on Visual Word Identification Differ Across Letter Positions.低熵环境中的朋友:正字法邻域效应在视觉单词识别中因字母位置而异。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Dec;44(12):e12917. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12917.