Mayes A R, Holdstock J S, Isaac C L, Hunkin N M, Roberts N
Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK.
Hippocampus. 2002;12(3):325-40. doi: 10.1002/hipo.1111.
There is disagreement about whether selective hippocampal lesions in humans cause clear item recognition as well as recall deficits. Whereas Reed and Squire (Behav Neurosci 1997;111:667-775) found that patients with adult-onset relatively selective hippocampal lesions showed clear item recognition deficits, Vargha-Khadem et al. (Science 1997;277: 376-380, Soc Neurosci Abstr 1998;24:1523) found that 3 patients who suffered selective hippocampal damage in early childhood showed clear recall deficits, but had relatively normal item recognition. Manns and Squire (Hippocampus 1999;9:495-499) argued, however, that item recognition may have been spared in these patients because the early onset of their pathology allowed compensatory mechanisms to develop. Therefore, to determine whether early lesion onset is critical for the relative sparing of item recognition and to determine whether its occurrence is influenced by task factors, we extensively examined item recognition in patient Y.R., who has pathology of adult-onset restricted to the hippocampus. Like the developmental cases, she showed clear free recall deficits on 34 tests, but her item recognition on 43 tests was relatively spared, and markedly less disrupted than her recall. Her item recognition performance relative to that of her controls was not significantly influenced by whether tests tapped visual or verbal materials, had a yes/no or forced-choice format, contained few or many items, had one or several foils per target item, used short or very long delays, or were difficult or easy for normal subjects. Interestingly, YR's bilateral hippocampal destruction was greater than at least 2 of the 3 patients of Manns and Squire (Hippocampus 1999;9:495-499). The possible reasons why item recognition differs across patients with relatively selective hippocampal damage of adult-onset and how the reasons that are truly critical can be best identified are discussed.
关于人类海马体选择性损伤是否会导致明显的项目识别以及回忆缺陷,目前存在分歧。里德和斯奎尔(《行为神经科学》1997年;111:667 - 775)发现,成年后出现相对选择性海马体损伤的患者表现出明显的项目识别缺陷,而瓦尔加 - 卡德姆等人(《科学》1997年;277:376 - 380,《社会神经科学摘要》1998年;24:1523)发现,3名在幼儿期遭受选择性海马体损伤的患者表现出明显的回忆缺陷,但项目识别相对正常。然而,曼斯和斯奎尔(《海马体》1999年;9:495 - 499)认为,这些患者的项目识别可能未受影响,因为其病理状况早期发作使得代偿机制得以发展。因此,为了确定早期损伤发作对于项目识别相对保留是否至关重要,以及确定其发生是否受任务因素影响,我们对患者Y.R.进行了广泛的项目识别检查,她患有成年后发作且局限于海马体的病变。与发育性病例一样,她在34项测试中表现出明显的自由回忆缺陷,但在43项测试中的项目识别相对保留,且比她的回忆受到的干扰明显更小。相对于对照组,她的项目识别表现不受测试所涉及的视觉或语言材料、是是非题还是强制选择格式、包含项目数量少或多、每个目标项目有一个或多个干扰项、使用短延迟还是非常长的延迟,以及对正常受试者来说是困难还是容易等因素的显著影响。有趣的是,YR双侧海马体的破坏程度比曼斯和斯奎尔(《海马体》1999年;9:495 - 499)的3名患者中的至少2名还要严重。本文讨论了成年后相对选择性海马体损伤患者项目识别存在差异的可能原因,以及如何最好地确定真正关键的原因。