Eur J Cancer. 2002 Jul;38(11):1458-64. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00397-5.
The optimal frequency of breast cancer screening has been a subject of debate since the inception of the UK National Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP). This paper reports on the only randomised trial directly comparing different screening intervals. 99389 women aged 50-62 years who had been invited to a prevalent screen were randomly allocated after the scheduled prevalent screen date to the study arm (invited to three further annual screens), or to the control arm (invited to the standard single screen 3 years later). 37530 women in the study arm and 38492 in the control arm had attended the prevalent screen. The endpoint was predicted breast cancer deaths. The prediction was based on both the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and a similar method derived from survival data from a series of tumours in the Swedish Two-County screening trial (2CS). Both indices were based on the size, lymph node status and histological grade of the invasive tumours diagnosed in the two arms of the trial. The pathology of the cases diagnosed was subject to review by two pathologists using standard criteria. The tumours diagnosed in the study arm were significantly smaller than those diagnosed in the control arm (P=0.05). The relative risk of death from breast cancer for the annual compared with the 3-yearly group was 0.95 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.83-1.07, P=0.4) using the NPI and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77-1.03, P=0.09) using the 2CS. Shortening of the screening interval in this age group is predicted to have a relatively small effect on breast cancer mortality. Improvements to the screening programme would be targeted more productively on areas other than the screening interval, such as improving the screening quality.
自英国国家乳腺癌筛查计划(NHSBSP)启动以来,乳腺癌筛查的最佳频率一直是一个备受争议的话题。本文报道了唯一一项直接比较不同筛查间隔的随机试验。99389名年龄在50 - 62岁之间被邀请参加普查的女性,在预定的普查日期之后,被随机分配到研究组(被邀请再进行三次年度筛查)或对照组(被邀请在三年后进行标准的单次筛查)。研究组有37530名女性参加了普查,对照组有38492名女性参加了普查。终点指标是预测的乳腺癌死亡人数。预测基于诺丁汉预后指数(NPI)以及一种从瑞典双县筛查试验(2CS)中一系列肿瘤的生存数据推导而来的类似方法。这两个指数均基于试验两组中诊断出的浸润性肿瘤的大小、淋巴结状态和组织学分级。确诊病例的病理由两名病理学家按照标准标准进行复查。研究组诊断出的肿瘤明显小于对照组(P = 0.05)。使用NPI时,年度筛查组与三年一次筛查组相比,乳腺癌死亡的相对风险为0.95(95%置信区间(CI):0.83 - 1.07,P = 0.4);使用2CS时,相对风险为0.89(95% CI:0.77 - 1.03,P = 0.09)。预计在这个年龄组缩短筛查间隔对乳腺癌死亡率的影响相对较小。筛查计划的改进应更有针对性地集中在筛查间隔以外的领域,如提高筛查质量。