• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌筛查的频率:英国癌症研究协调委员会随机试验的结果。英国癌症研究协调委员会

The frequency of breast cancer screening: results from the UKCCCR Randomised Trial. United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2002 Jul;38(11):1458-64. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00397-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00397-5
PMID:12110490
Abstract

The optimal frequency of breast cancer screening has been a subject of debate since the inception of the UK National Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP). This paper reports on the only randomised trial directly comparing different screening intervals. 99389 women aged 50-62 years who had been invited to a prevalent screen were randomly allocated after the scheduled prevalent screen date to the study arm (invited to three further annual screens), or to the control arm (invited to the standard single screen 3 years later). 37530 women in the study arm and 38492 in the control arm had attended the prevalent screen. The endpoint was predicted breast cancer deaths. The prediction was based on both the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) and a similar method derived from survival data from a series of tumours in the Swedish Two-County screening trial (2CS). Both indices were based on the size, lymph node status and histological grade of the invasive tumours diagnosed in the two arms of the trial. The pathology of the cases diagnosed was subject to review by two pathologists using standard criteria. The tumours diagnosed in the study arm were significantly smaller than those diagnosed in the control arm (P=0.05). The relative risk of death from breast cancer for the annual compared with the 3-yearly group was 0.95 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.83-1.07, P=0.4) using the NPI and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77-1.03, P=0.09) using the 2CS. Shortening of the screening interval in this age group is predicted to have a relatively small effect on breast cancer mortality. Improvements to the screening programme would be targeted more productively on areas other than the screening interval, such as improving the screening quality.

摘要

自英国国家乳腺癌筛查计划(NHSBSP)启动以来,乳腺癌筛查的最佳频率一直是一个备受争议的话题。本文报道了唯一一项直接比较不同筛查间隔的随机试验。99389名年龄在50 - 62岁之间被邀请参加普查的女性,在预定的普查日期之后,被随机分配到研究组(被邀请再进行三次年度筛查)或对照组(被邀请在三年后进行标准的单次筛查)。研究组有37530名女性参加了普查,对照组有38492名女性参加了普查。终点指标是预测的乳腺癌死亡人数。预测基于诺丁汉预后指数(NPI)以及一种从瑞典双县筛查试验(2CS)中一系列肿瘤的生存数据推导而来的类似方法。这两个指数均基于试验两组中诊断出的浸润性肿瘤的大小、淋巴结状态和组织学分级。确诊病例的病理由两名病理学家按照标准标准进行复查。研究组诊断出的肿瘤明显小于对照组(P = 0.05)。使用NPI时,年度筛查组与三年一次筛查组相比,乳腺癌死亡的相对风险为0.95(95%置信区间(CI):0.83 - 1.07,P = 0.4);使用2CS时,相对风险为0.89(95% CI:0.77 - 1.03,P = 0.09)。预计在这个年龄组缩短筛查间隔对乳腺癌死亡率的影响相对较小。筛查计划的改进应更有针对性地集中在筛查间隔以外的领域,如提高筛查质量。

相似文献

1
The frequency of breast cancer screening: results from the UKCCCR Randomised Trial. United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research.乳腺癌筛查的频率:英国癌症研究协调委员会随机试验的结果。英国癌症研究协调委员会
Eur J Cancer. 2002 Jul;38(11):1458-64. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00397-5.
2
Mammographic surveillance in women younger than 50 years who have a family history of breast cancer: tumour characteristics and projected effect on mortality in the prospective, single-arm, FH01 study.50 岁以下有乳腺癌家族史的女性进行乳房 X 线摄影监测:前瞻性、单臂 FH01 研究中的肿瘤特征和对死亡率的预计影响。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Dec;11(12):1127-34. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70263-1. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
3
Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.25 年随访加拿大国家乳腺癌筛查研究的乳腺癌发病率和死亡率:随机筛查试验。
BMJ. 2014 Feb 11;348:g366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g366.
4
Screening for breast cancer detects tumours at an earlier biological stage.
Br J Surg. 1993 Jul;80(7):863-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800718.
5
A trial to study the effect on breast cancer mortality of annual mammographic screening in women starting at age 40. Trial Steering Group.一项关于40岁开始的女性每年进行乳房X光筛查对乳腺癌死亡率影响的研究。试验指导小组。
J Med Screen. 1999;6(3):144-8. doi: 10.1136/jms.6.3.144.
6
Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.加拿大全国乳腺筛查研究:2. 50至59岁女性的乳腺癌检出率和死亡率。
CMAJ. 1992 Nov 15;147(10):1477-88.
7
Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.瑞典两县乳腺癌钼靶筛查项目的更新
Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;30(1):187-210.
8
Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality (UK Age trial): final results of a randomised, controlled trial.40 岁开始进行乳腺 X 线筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响(英国年龄试验):一项随机对照试验的最终结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Sep;21(9):1165-1172. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30398-3. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
9
Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.加拿大全国乳腺筛查研究:1. 40至49岁女性的乳腺癌检出率和死亡率。
CMAJ. 1992 Nov 15;147(10):1459-76.
10
Effect of population breast screening on breast cancer mortality up to 2005 in England and Wales: an individual-level cohort study.英国和威尔士截至2005年的人群乳腺癌筛查对乳腺癌死亡率的影响:一项个体水平队列研究。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jan 17;116(2):246-252. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.415. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a website to help women aged 55 + incorporate risk in decision-making about breast cancer screening and prevention medications.开发一个网站,以帮助55岁及以上的女性在乳腺癌筛查和预防药物的决策中纳入风险因素。
Patient Educ Couns. 2025 Aug;137:108819. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2025.108819. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
Patient counseling for breast cancer screening: Taking changes to USPSTF recommendations into account.乳腺癌筛查的患者咨询:考虑美国预防服务工作组建议的变化
OBG Manag. 2023 Dec;35(12):43-49. doi: 10.12788/obgm.0334.
3
Population Attributable Risk of Advanced-Stage Breast Cancer by Race and Ethnicity.
按种族和族裔划分的晚期乳腺癌的人群归因风险。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):167-175. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5242.
4
The cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified breast cancer screening in the UK.英国风险分层乳腺癌筛查的成本效益。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Nov;129(11):1801-1809. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02461-1. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
5
Risk stratified breast cancer screening: UK healthcare policy decision-making stakeholders' views on a low-risk breast screening pathway.风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国医疗保健政策决策利益相关者对低风险乳腺癌筛查途径的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07158-9.
6
Breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years: Impact of length of screening interval on effectiveness of the program.在 40-49 岁女性中用乳房 X 光摄影进行乳腺癌筛查:筛查间隔长度对该计划效果的影响。
J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):200-206. doi: 10.1177/0969141320918283. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Simulating the Impact of Risk-Based Screening and Treatment on Breast Cancer Outcomes with MISCAN-Fadia.使用 MISCAN-Fadia 模拟基于风险的筛查和治疗对乳腺癌结局的影响。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Apr;38(1_suppl):54S-65S. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17711928.
8
Satisfaction, discomfort, obligations, and concerns in population-based breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study in a Danish population.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查中的满意度、不适、义务和担忧:丹麦人群的横断面研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2438-2.
9
Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?北美乳房X光检查的假阳性率是否过高?
Br J Radiol. 2016 Sep;89(1065):20160045. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160045. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
10
Mammography screening in less developed countries.欠发达国家的乳腺钼靶筛查。
Springerplus. 2015 Oct 15;4:615. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1394-8. eCollection 2015.