• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk stratified breast cancer screening: UK healthcare policy decision-making stakeholders' views on a low-risk breast screening pathway.风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国医疗保健政策决策利益相关者对低风险乳腺癌筛查途径的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07158-9.
2
Introducing a low-risk breast screening pathway into the NHS Breast Screening Programme: Views from healthcare professionals who are delivering risk-stratified screening.将低风险乳腺癌筛查途径引入国民保健制度乳腺筛查计划:实施风险分层筛查的医疗保健专业人员的观点。
Womens Health (Lond). 2021 Jan-Dec;17:17455065211009746. doi: 10.1177/17455065211009746.
3
Healthcare professionals' views following implementation of risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme.实施风险分层后,医疗保健专业人员对国家乳腺癌筛查计划的看法。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10134-0.
4
What are the views of three key stakeholder groups on extending the breast screening interval for low-risk women? A secondary qualitative analysis.三个关键利益相关者群体对延长低危女性乳房筛查间隔的看法是什么?二次定性分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3287-3296. doi: 10.1111/hex.13637. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
5
The feasibility of implementing risk stratification into a national breast cancer screening programme: a focus group study investigating the perspectives of healthcare personnel responsible for delivery.实施风险分层筛查纳入国家乳腺癌筛查计划的可行性:一项针对负责实施人员的观点的焦点小组研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 May 2;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01730-0.
6
Extending screening intervals for women at low risk of breast cancer: do they find it acceptable?延长低危乳腺癌女性的筛查间隔:她们能接受吗?
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 29;21(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08347-w.
7
The introduction of risk stratified screening into the NHS breast screening Programme: views from British-Pakistani women.将风险分层筛查引入国民保健制度乳房筛查计划:英国-巴基斯坦裔妇女的观点。
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 20;20(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06959-2.
8
Women's decision-making regarding risk-stratified breast cancer screening and prevention from the perspective of international healthcare professionals.从国际医疗保健专业人员的角度来看,女性在风险分层乳腺癌筛查和预防方面的决策。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197772. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197772. eCollection 2018.
9
A stakeholder analysis to prepare for real-world evaluation of integrating artificial intelligent algorithms into breast screening (PREP-AIR study): a qualitative study using the WHO guide.一项为将人工智能算法整合到乳腺筛查的真实世界评估做准备的利益相关者分析(PREP-AIR研究):一项使用世界卫生组织指南的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 2;24(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10926-z.
10
What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).风险分层筛查作为国民保健制度乳房筛查计划的一部分有哪些益处和危害?BC-predict 与常规筛查的多中心非随机比较研究方案(NCT04359420)。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07054-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Key stakeholders' perspectives on implementation of risk-based population breast cancer screening in Australia - "We can either get on the bus or get under it".澳大利亚关键利益相关者对实施基于风险的人群乳腺癌筛查的看法——“我们要么上车,要么被车碾过” 。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Sep 1;83(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01690-5.
2
Acceptability of risk-based breast cancer screening among professionals and healthcare providers from 6 countries contributing to the MyPeBS study.来自参与MyPeBS研究的6个国家的专业人员和医疗服务提供者对基于风险的乳腺癌筛查的可接受性。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13848-z.
3
Navigating the risks: Stakeholder views on risk-based cervical cancer screening.应对风险:利益相关者对基于风险的宫颈癌筛查的看法。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 5;20(3):e0317986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317986. eCollection 2025.
4
Causative Genes of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD)-Related Breast Cancer and Specific Strategies at Present.同源重组缺陷(HRD)相关乳腺癌的致病基因及目前的特异性策略
Curr Oncol. 2025 Feb 6;32(2):90. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32020090.
5
Acceptability and perceptions of personalised risk-based cancer screening among health-care professionals and the general public: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健专业人员和公众对基于个性化风险的癌症筛查的可接受性和认知:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Feb;10(2):e85-e96. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00278-0.
6
Risk-Adapted Breast Screening for Women at Low Predicted Risk of Breast Cancer: An Online Discrete Choice Experiment.基于风险的乳腺癌低预测风险女性乳房筛查:一项在线离散选择实验。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jul;44(5):586-600. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241254828. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
7
Women's Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perception on Personalized Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study in Malaysia.马来西亚妇女对个性化风险分层乳腺癌筛查的知识、态度和认知:一项横断面研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Apr 1;25(4):1231-1240. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.4.1231.
8
Risk-Stratified Breast Cancer Screening in Malaysia: Challenges and Opportunities.马来西亚风险分层乳腺癌筛查:挑战与机遇。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Mar 1;25(3):785-791. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.3.785.
9
"For and against" factors influencing participation in personalized breast cancer screening programs: a qualitative systematic review until March 2022.影响参与个性化乳腺癌筛查项目的“支持与反对”因素:截至2022年3月的定性系统评价
Arch Public Health. 2024 Feb 22;82(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01248-x.
10
Implementing systematic melanoma risk assessment and risk-tailored surveillance in a skin cancer focussed dermatology clinic: A qualitative study of feasibility and acceptability to patients and clinic staff.在以皮肤癌为重点的皮肤科诊所中实施系统性黑色素瘤风险评估和针对风险的监测:对患者和临床工作人员的可行性和可接受性的定性研究。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(2):e6976. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6976.

本文引用的文献

1
What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).风险分层筛查作为国民保健制度乳房筛查计划的一部分有哪些益处和危害?BC-predict 与常规筛查的多中心非随机比较研究方案(NCT04359420)。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07054-2.
2
Attitudes towards risk-stratified breast cancer screening among women in England: A cross-sectional survey.英格兰女性对风险分层乳腺癌筛查的态度:一项横断面调查。
J Med Screen. 2020 Sep;27(3):138-145. doi: 10.1177/0969141319883662. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
3
A Case-Control Study to Add Volumetric or Clinical Mammographic Density into the Tyrer-Cuzick Breast Cancer Risk Model.一项将体积性或临床乳腺钼靶密度纳入泰勒-库齐克乳腺癌风险模型的病例对照研究。
J Breast Imaging. 2019 Jun;1(2):99-106. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbz006. Epub 2019 May 11.
4
How do women experience a false-positive test result from breast screening? A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.女性如何体验乳房筛查的假阳性测试结果?一项定性研究的系统评价和主题综合分析。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Aug;121(4):351-358. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0524-4. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
5
Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification.比较乳腺癌风险预测模型的验证及对未来风险分层的预测。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Mar 1;112(3):278-285. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz113.
6
A systematic review and quality assessment of individualised breast cancer risk prediction models.系统评价和个体化乳腺癌风险预测模型的质量评估。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul;121(1):76-85. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0476-8. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
Breast cancer pathology and stage are better predicted by risk stratification models that include mammographic density and common genetic variants.乳腺癌的病理和分期可以通过包括乳腺密度和常见遗传变异在内的风险分层模型更好地预测。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jul;176(1):141-148. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05210-2. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
8
Health professionals' perspectives on breast cancer risk stratification: understanding evaluation of risk versus screening for disease.医疗专业人员对乳腺癌风险分层的看法:理解风险评估与疾病筛查
Public Health Rev. 2019 Feb 28;40:2. doi: 10.1186/s40985-019-0111-5. eCollection 2019.
9
10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study.四种乳腺癌风险模型的 10 年表现:一项验证研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Apr;20(4):504-517. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30902-1. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study.女性如何看待基于风险的乳房 X 光筛查?一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Nov;33(11):1905-1912. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4601-9. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

风险分层乳腺癌筛查:英国医疗保健政策决策利益相关者对低风险乳腺癌筛查途径的看法。

Risk stratified breast cancer screening: UK healthcare policy decision-making stakeholders' views on a low-risk breast screening pathway.

机构信息

Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07158-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-020-07158-9
PMID:32698780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7374862/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is international interest in risk-stratification of breast screening programmes to allow women at higher risk to benefit from more frequent screening and chemoprevention. Risk-stratification also identifies women at low-risk who could be screened less frequently, as the harms of breast screening may outweigh benefits for this group. The present research aimed to elicit the views of national healthcare policy decision-makers regarding implementation of less frequent screening intervals for women at low-risk.

METHODS

Seventeen professionals were purposively recruited to ensure relevant professional group representation directly or indirectly associated with the UK National Screening Committee and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes are reported: (1) producing the evidence defining low-risk, describing requirements preceding implementation; (2) the impact of risk stratification on women is complicated, focusing on gaining acceptability from women; and (3) practically implementing a low-risk pathway, where feasibility questions are highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, national healthcare policy decision-makers appear to believe that risk-stratified breast screening is acceptable, in principle. It will however be essential to address key obstacles prior to implementation in national programmes.

摘要

背景

国际上对乳腺筛查项目进行风险分层很感兴趣,以便让高风险女性通过更频繁的筛查和化学预防获益。风险分层还可以识别低风险女性,对她们可以减少筛查频率,因为乳腺筛查的危害可能超过对该群体的益处。本研究旨在了解国家医疗保健政策决策者对低危女性实施更频繁筛查间隔的看法。

方法

为确保直接或间接与英国国家筛查委员会和国家卫生与保健卓越研究所(NICE)临床指南相关的专业团体代表,特选择了 17 名专业人员进行有针对性的招募。使用主题分析对访谈进行分析。

结果

报告了三个主题:(1)制定定义低危的证据,描述实施前的要求;(2)风险分层对女性的影响很复杂,重点是获得女性的认可;(3)切实实施低危途径,突出可行性问题。

结论

总体而言,国家医疗保健政策决策者似乎认为,风险分层的乳腺筛查原则上是可以接受的。然而,在国家计划中实施之前,必须解决关键障碍。