Crews Kristine R, Stewart Clinton F, Jones-Wallace Dana, Thompson Stephen J, Houghton Peter J, Heideman Richard L, Fouladi Maryam, Bowers Daniel C, Chintagumpala Murali M, Gajjar Amar
Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA.
Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Jul;8(7):2202-9.
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIAs) on the disposition of irinotecan and metabolites in pediatric patients with high-grade glioma.
Pediatric patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma were enrolled on this study between March 1999 and February 2001. During course 1, irinotecan was administered as a 60-min i.v. infusion at a dosage of 20 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days of 2 consecutive weeks. On days 1 and 12 of course 1, we collected serial plasma samples to measure the concentrations of the lactone and total forms of irinotecan and its metabolites SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin), SN-38 glucuronide (7-ethyl-10-[3,4,5-trihydroxy-pyran-2-carboxylic acid]camptothecin), and 7-ethyl-10-[4-N-(5-aminopentanoic acid)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin.
Thirty-one patients were enrolled. In patients receiving EIAs, the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of irinotecan lactone and SN-38 lactone was significantly lower (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002, respectively), and the irinotecan lactone clearance was significantly higher (P = 0.0003), as compared with those in patients who received no EIAs. The glucuronidation ratio was higher (P = 0.0009), and the ratio of SN-38 AUC to irinotecan AUC was lower (P = 0.02) in patients who received EIAs. Two patients receiving EIAs tolerated increased irinotecan dosages of 30 and 40 mg/m(2)/day without toxicity. One patient receiving EIAs experienced grade 3 diarrhea when the dosage of irinotecan was increased to 60 mg/m(2)/day.
EIAs increase the clearance of irinotecan and cause a decrease in systemic exposure to the active metabolite SN-38. Patients who are receiving irinotecan and who require anticonvulsants should be placed on non-EIA therapy, when possible.
本研究旨在确定酶诱导抗惊厥药(EIAs)对高级别胶质瘤患儿伊立替康及其代谢产物处置的影响。
1999年3月至2001年2月期间,新诊断的高级别胶质瘤患儿被纳入本研究。在第1疗程中,伊立替康以20mg/m²/天的剂量静脉输注60分钟,连续2周,每周5天。在第1疗程的第1天和第12天,我们采集系列血浆样本,以测量伊立替康及其代谢产物SN-38(7-乙基-10-羟基喜树碱)、SN-38葡萄糖醛酸苷(7-乙基-10-[3,4,5-三羟基-吡喃-2-羧酸]喜树碱)和7-乙基-10-[4-N-(5-氨基戊酸)-1-哌啶基]羰基氧基喜树碱的内酯形式和总形式的浓度。
31名患者被纳入研究。与未接受EIAs的患者相比,接受EIAs的患者中,伊立替康内酯和SN-38内酯的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)显著降低(分别为P = 0.01和P = 0.002),伊立替康内酯清除率显著升高(P = 0.0003)。接受EIAs的患者葡萄糖醛酸化率更高(P = 0.0009),SN-38 AUC与伊立替康AUC的比值更低(P = 0.02)。两名接受EIAs的患者耐受了30和40mg/m²/天的伊立替康剂量增加,且无毒性。一名接受EIAs的患者在伊立替康剂量增加至60mg/m²/天时出现3级腹泻。
EIAs增加伊立替康的清除率,并导致活性代谢产物SN-38的全身暴露减少。接受伊立替康且需要抗惊厥药的患者应尽可能采用非EIA治疗。