Berg Alexander K, Buckner Jan C, Galanis Evanthia, Jaeckle Kurt A, Ames Matthew M, Reid Joel M
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Upsher-Smith Laboratories Inc., Maple Grove, MN, USA.
Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Nov;55(11):1303-12. doi: 10.1002/jcph.543. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
The population pharmacokinetic model reported here was developed using data from 2 phase 2 trials of irinotecan for treatment of malignant glioma to quantify the impact of concomitant therapy with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) on irinotecan pharmacokinetics. Patients received weekly irinotecan doses of 100 to 400 mg/m(2) , and plasma samples were collected and analyzed for irinotecan and its APC, SN-38, and SN-38G metabolites. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was employed for population pharmacokinetic analysis. Concomitant therapy with phenytoin, phenobarbital, or carbamazepine increased the clearances of irinotecan, SN-38, and SN-38G but not APC. SN-38 clearance was 2-fold higher with concomitant EIAED use, resulting in 40% lower SN-38 exposure. Evaluation of additional covariates revealed no clinically relevant effects of sex or concomitant corticosteroid use. The population pharmacokinetic model suggests that a 1.7-fold increase in irinotecan dose may compensate for decreases in SN-38 exposure in the presence of concomitant EIAEDs. Although slightly more conservative, this dose adjustment is consistent with those recommended based on increases in the maximally tolerated dose for malignant glioma patients receiving EIAEDs and may be an appropriate starting point for further investigation when extrapolating to other cancer types or alternative regimens.
本文报道的群体药代动力学模型是利用伊立替康治疗恶性胶质瘤的2项2期试验数据建立的,以量化酶诱导抗癫痫药物(EIAEDs)联合治疗对伊立替康药代动力学的影响。患者每周接受100至400mg/m²的伊立替康剂量,并采集血浆样本,分析伊立替康及其活性代谢产物APC、SN-38和SN-38G。采用非线性混合效应模型进行群体药代动力学分析。苯妥英、苯巴比妥或卡马西平联合治疗可增加伊立替康、SN-38和SN-38G的清除率,但不增加APC的清除率。联合使用EIAEDs时,SN-38清除率高出2倍,导致SN-38暴露量降低40%。对其他协变量的评估显示,性别或联合使用皮质类固醇无临床相关影响。群体药代动力学模型表明,在联合使用EIAEDs的情况下,伊立替康剂量增加1.7倍可能补偿SN-38暴露量的降低。虽然稍显保守,但这种剂量调整与基于接受EIAEDs的恶性胶质瘤患者最大耐受剂量增加而推荐的调整一致,并且在推断到其他癌症类型或替代方案时,可能是进一步研究的合适起点。