Dettenkofer M, Forster D H, Ebner W, Gastmeier P, Rüden H, Daschner F D
Institute of Environmental Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology, Freiburg University Hospital, Germany.
Infection. 2002 Jun;30(3):164-7. doi: 10.1007/s15010-002-2170-6.
Although there is consensus in the international literature on the benefits of using perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP), there is still considerable scope for improving its use in many hospitals.
In this study, data on the practice of PAP were recorded in eight German hospitals within the framework of a prospective controlled interventional study for the surveillance and prevention of nosocomial infections.
A total of 627 surgical procedures (appendectomies, other colorectal procedures, total prosthetic hip replacement) were assessed; 397 with PAP and 224 without PAP; six procedures could not be evaluated. Of the 397 PAP recorded, only 180 (45.3%) were performed correctly in accordance with international standards as a preoperative single dose (19/59 PAP in appendectomies, 72/188 PAP in other colorectal procedures, 89/150 PAP in total prosthetic hip replacement).
There is still great uncertainty regarding the point in time at which PAP should be administered and its duration. Additional efforts are necessary to improve PAP in accordance with published evidence-based guidelines.
尽管国际文献中对于围手术期抗生素预防(PAP)的益处已达成共识,但在许多医院中其使用仍有很大的改进空间。
在本研究中,作为一项前瞻性对照干预性研究的一部分,该研究旨在监测和预防医院感染,在八家德国医院记录了PAP的使用数据。
共评估了627例外科手术(阑尾切除术、其他结直肠手术、全髋关节置换术);397例使用PAP,224例未使用PAP;6例手术无法评估。在记录的397例PAP中,只有180例(45.3%)按照国际标准作为术前单次剂量正确使用(阑尾切除术中59例PAP中有19例,其他结直肠手术中188例PAP中有72例,全髋关节置换术中150例PAP中有89例)。
关于PAP的给药时间点及其持续时间仍存在很大的不确定性。需要做出更多努力,以根据已发表的循证指南改进PAP的使用。