Gurunthalingam Meenalotchini P, Keche Yogendra N, Gaikwad Nitin R, Dhaneria Suryaprakash, Singh Madhusudan P
Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, IND.
Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Ruxmaniben Deepchand Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, IND.
Cureus. 2023 May 10;15(5):e38844. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38844. eCollection 2023 May.
Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) has been a boon in the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs). This study was conducted to assess and evaluate the selection, timing, and duration of administration of SAP and their compliance with national and international guidelines in a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. This retrospective study included the data collected from the central records department in a tertiary care teaching hospital on major surgeries conducted between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2018, from the departments of ENT, general surgery, orthopedic surgery, and obstetrics and gynecology. The data was analyzed for the appropriateness of their indication for SAP administration, choice, timing, and duration of antibiotics, and compliance with the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines. Results and interpretation Out of the total 394 case records included, only 2.53% (n = 10) of the cases were given an appropriate antibiotic. The duration of SAP was appropriate only in 6.53% (n = 24), and the timing of SAP administration was appropriate only in 50.76% (n = 204). The most commonly used antibiotic was ceftriaxone (pre-operative 58.12% (n = 229) and post-operative 43.14% (n = 170)). Major inappropriateness was observed in the selection of antibiotics which may be attributed to the non-availability of cefazolin in the institute. The inappropriateness of the duration of the SAP may be attributed to the extra precautions taken by the treating physicians to prevent SSIs. The overall compliance of the surgical cases with respect to the ASHP and ICMR guidelines was less than 1%. Conclusion This study identified the lacuna between the guidelines for SAP and the clinical application of the same. It also identified the areas where quality improvement was needed which can be improved by implementing antimicrobial stewardship, especially the choice and the duration of SAP administration.
外科手术抗生素预防(SAP)在预防手术部位感染(SSI)方面是一项福音。本研究旨在评估和评价印度一家三级护理教学医院中SAP的选择、给药时间和持续时间,以及它们与国家和国际指南的符合情况。这项回顾性研究纳入了从一家三级护理教学医院的中央记录部门收集的数据,这些数据来自2018年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间耳鼻喉科、普通外科、整形外科以及妇产科进行的重大手术。分析了这些数据中SAP给药指征的适宜性、抗生素的选择、给药时间和持续时间,以及与美国卫生系统药师协会(ASHP)和印度医学研究理事会(ICMR)指南的符合情况。结果与解读 在纳入的总共394份病例记录中,只有2.53%(n = 10)的病例使用了合适的抗生素。SAP的持续时间仅在6.53%(n = 24)的病例中是合适的,而SAP给药时间仅在50.76%(n = 204)的病例中是合适的。最常用的抗生素是头孢曲松(术前58.12%(n = 229),术后43.14%(n = 170))。在抗生素选择方面观察到主要的不恰当之处,这可能归因于该机构无法获得头孢唑林。SAP持续时间的不恰当可能归因于治疗医生为预防SSI采取的额外预防措施。手术病例对ASHP和ICMR指南的总体符合率低于1%。结论 本研究确定了SAP指南与临床应用之间的差距。它还确定了需要改进质量的领域,通过实施抗菌药物管理,特别是SAP给药的选择和持续时间,可以改善这些领域。