Broering Teresa J, Parker John S L, Joyce Patricia L, Kim Jonghwa, Nibert Max L
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Virol. 2002 Aug;76(16):8285-97. doi: 10.1128/jvi.76.16.8285-8297.2002.
Cells infected with mammalian orthoreoviruses contain large cytoplasmic phase-dense inclusions believed to be the sites of viral replication and assembly, but the morphogenesis, structure, and specific functions of these "viral factories" are poorly understood. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that reovirus nonstructural protein microNS expressed in transfected cells forms inclusions that resemble the globular viral factories formed in cells infected with reovirus strain type 3 Dearing from our laboratory (T3D(N)). In the transfected cells, the formation of microNS large globular perinuclear inclusions was dependent on the microtubule network, as demonstrated by the appearance of many smaller microNS globular inclusions dispersed throughout the cytoplasm after treatment with the microtubule-depolymerizing drug nocodazole. Coexpression of microNS and reovirus protein micro2 from a different strain, type 1 Lang (T1L), which forms filamentous viral factories, altered the distributions of both proteins. In cotransfected cells, the two proteins colocalized in thick filamentous structures. After nocodazole treatment, many small dispersed globular inclusions containing microNS and micro2 were seen, demonstrating that the microtubule network is required for the formation of the filamentous structures. When coexpressed, the micro2 protein from T3D(N) also colocalized with microNS, but in globular inclusions rather than filamentous structures. The morphology difference between the globular inclusions containing microNS and micro2 protein from T3D(N) and the filamentous structures containing microNS and micro2 protein from T1L in cotransfected cells mimicked the morphology difference between globular and filamentous factories in reovirus-infected cells, which is determined by the micro2-encoding M1 genome segment. We found that the first 40 amino acids of microNS are required for colocalization with micro2 but not for inclusion formation. Similarly, a fusion of microNS amino acids 1 to 41 to green fluorescent protein was sufficient for colocalization with the micro2 protein from T1L but not for inclusion formation. These observations suggest a functional difference between microNS and microNSC, a smaller form of the protein that is present in infected cells and that is missing amino acids from the amino terminus of microNS. The capacity of microNS to form inclusions and to colocalize with micro2 in transfected cells suggests a key role for microNS in forming viral factories in reovirus-infected cells.
感染哺乳动物正呼肠孤病毒的细胞含有大量细胞质中电子密度高的包涵体,这些包涵体被认为是病毒复制和组装的场所,但这些“病毒工厂”的形态发生、结构和特定功能却知之甚少。利用免疫荧光显微镜技术,我们发现转染细胞中表达的呼肠孤病毒非结构蛋白microNS形成的包涵体类似于我们实验室的3型迪林呼肠孤病毒株(T3D(N))感染细胞中形成的球状病毒工厂。在转染细胞中,microNS大的球状核周包涵体的形成依赖于微管网络,用微管解聚药物诺考达唑处理后,许多较小的microNS球状包涵体分散在整个细胞质中,这证明了这一点。来自不同毒株1型朗株(T1L)的microNS和呼肠孤病毒蛋白micro2共表达,T1L形成丝状病毒工厂,改变了这两种蛋白的分布。在共转染细胞中,这两种蛋白共定位于粗丝状结构中。诺考达唑处理后,可见许多含有microNS和micro2的小的分散球状包涵体,表明丝状结构的形成需要微管网络。当共表达时,T3D(N)的micro2蛋白也与microNS共定位,但在球状包涵体中而不是丝状结构中。共转染细胞中来自T3D(N)的含有microNS和micro2蛋白的球状包涵体与来自T1L的含有microNS和micro2蛋白的丝状结构之间的形态差异,模拟了呼肠孤病毒感染细胞中球状和丝状工厂之间的形态差异,这是由编码micro2的M1基因组片段决定的。我们发现microNS的前40个氨基酸是与micro2共定位所必需的,但不是包涵体形成所必需的。同样,microNS氨基酸1至41与绿色荧光蛋白的融合足以与T1L的micro2蛋白共定位,但不足以形成包涵体。这些观察结果表明,microNS与microNSC之间存在功能差异,microNSC是感染细胞中存在的一种较小形式的蛋白,它缺少microNS氨基末端的氨基酸。microNS在转染细胞中形成包涵体并与micro2共定位的能力表明,microNS在呼肠孤病毒感染细胞中形成病毒工厂方面起关键作用。