Dubrowski A, Bock O, Carnahan H, Jüngling S
Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3C5, Canada.
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Aug;145(3):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1120-y. Epub 2002 Jun 13.
We investigated the mechanisms underlying human prehension movements, by perturbing the size and position of virtual targets. Subjects grasped virtual target discs with thumb and index finger. In 25% of trials, target size or position (single perturbation), or both (double perturbation) were changed 300 ms after target appearance. The experiments were designed such that the kinematic profiles of grasp formation and hand transport had a similar shape, and were analysed by the same algorithm. We found that grasp kinematics were influenced by changes of target position, and transport kinematics by changes of target size; we also found that the kinematics of double-perturbation trials could not be explained as a linear combination of single-perturbation effects. These findings confirm and expand previous evidence against the view that grasp and transport are controlled by fully independent channels. Most importantly, we found that the time of correction onset was not the same for grasp and transport, neither in single- nor in double-perturbation trials. This outcome argues against a holistic (single-channel) model of prehension; instead, our data are consistent with the notion of two mutually coupled channels.
