Elefteriades John A, Quin Jacquelyn A, Hogan James F, Holcomb Wade G, Letsou George V, Chlosta William F, Glenn William W W L
Sections of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002 Jun;25(6):897-906. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00897.x.
The authors have previously shown that conditioning of the diaphragm for continuous bilateral pacing is a feasible and effective means of ventilation in patients with complete respiratory paralysis from high cervical (above C3) quadriplegia. The present study reports the long-term results of continuous diaphragmatic pacing. Twelve quadriplegia patients underwent bilateral phrenic nerve pacemaker placement and diaphragm conditioning from 1981 to 1987. Pacing was initiated at 11 Hz and progressively decreased to 7.1 Hz. A pulse train duration of 1.3 seconds for adults and 0.9 seconds for children was used. Long-term follow-up information obtained included pacing status (full-time, part-time, or mechanical ventilation), ventilation parameters, and social circumstances. Of the 12 patients, 6 continued to pace full time (mean 14.8 years); all were living at home. Three patients paced for an average of 1.8 years before stopping; two were institutionalized. One patient who paced full time for 6.5 years before lapsing to part time, lived at home. Two patients were deceased; one paced continuously for 10 years before his demise, the other stopped pacing after 1 year. Patients who stopped full-time pacing did so mainly for reasons of inadequate social or financial support or associated medical problems. All patients demonstrated normal tidal volumes and arterial blood gases while pacing full time. Despite theoretical concerns about long-term nerve damage, no patient lost the ability to pace the phrenic nerve. Threshold currents did not increase over time (original/follow-up: 0.46/0.47 for right, 0.45/0.46 for left), nor did maximal currents (original/follow-up: 1.16/1.14 for right, 1.37/1.26 for left). This follow-up confirms that quadriplegic patients are able to meet long-term, full-time ventilation requirements using phrenic nerve stimulation of the conditioned diaphragm. Careful review of diaphragmatic pacing candidates with respect to associated medical conditions, social support, and motivation is essential for appropriate patient selection and successful long-term results.
作者们之前已经表明,对膈神经进行连续双侧起搏的预处理,对于因高位颈髓(C3以上)四肢瘫导致完全呼吸麻痹的患者而言,是一种可行且有效的通气方式。本研究报告了连续膈神经起搏的长期结果。1981年至1987年间,12例四肢瘫患者接受了双侧膈神经起搏器植入及膈神经预处理。起搏起始频率为11Hz,并逐渐降至7.1Hz。成人的脉冲串持续时间为1.3秒,儿童为0.9秒。获得的长期随访信息包括起搏状态(全职、兼职或机械通气)、通气参数以及社会状况。12例患者中,6例继续全职起搏(平均14.8年);均居家生活。3例患者平均起搏1.8年后停止;其中2例住进了疗养院。1例患者全职起搏6.5年后转为兼职起搏,居家生活。2例患者已去世;1例在去世前连续起搏10年,另1例在起搏1年后停止。停止全职起搏的患者主要是因为社会或经济支持不足或存在相关医疗问题。所有患者在全职起搏时潮气量和动脉血气均正常。尽管从理论上担心长期神经损伤,但没有患者丧失膈神经起搏能力。阈值电流未随时间增加(右侧原始值/随访值:0.46/0.47,左侧0.45/0.46),最大电流也未增加(右侧原始值/随访值:1.16/1.14,左侧1.37/1.26)。该随访证实,四肢瘫患者能够通过对预处理的膈神经进行刺激来满足长期全职通气需求。对于膈神经起搏候选者,仔细评估其相关医疗状况、社会支持和积极性,对于恰当的患者选择及成功的长期结果至关重要。