Slagsvold Tore, Hansen Bo T, Johannessen Lars E, Lifjeld Jan T
Department of Biology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1050, Blindern, Norway.
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 22;269(1499):1449-55. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2045.
Sexual-selection theories generally assume that mating preferences are heritable traits. However, there is substantial evidence that the rearing environment may be important for the development of mating preferences, indicating that they may be learnt, or modified by experience. The relative importance of such sexual imprinting across species remains largely unexplored. Here, we report results of a large-scale cross-fostering experiment in the wild in which nestling birds were raised by parents of a different species. We show that resulting sexual imprinting may have a negative effect on pairing success in one species (the great tit, Parus major), but not in two other species (the blue tit, P. caeruleus and the pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca). A remarkable variation thus seems to exist, even between species that are congeneric and have similar breeding ecologies. The cross-fostering resulted in heterospecific pairings between the two tit species (female blue tit breeding with male great tit), which has never, to our knowledge, been previously documented. However, the chicks fledging from these nests were all blue tit.
性选择理论通常假定交配偏好是可遗传的性状。然而,有大量证据表明,饲养环境可能对交配偏好的形成很重要,这表明它们可能是通过学习获得的,或者会因经验而改变。这种性印记在不同物种间的相对重要性在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在此,我们报告了一项在野外进行的大规模交叉寄养实验的结果,实验中雏鸟由不同物种的亲鸟抚养。我们发现,由此产生的性印记可能会对一个物种(大山雀,Parus major)的配对成功率产生负面影响,但对另外两个物种(蓝山雀,P. caeruleus和斑姬鹟,Ficedula hypoleuca)则没有影响。因此,即使在同属且繁殖生态相似的物种之间,似乎也存在显著差异。交叉寄养导致了两种山雀之间的异种配对(雌性蓝山雀与雄性大山雀交配),据我们所知,此前从未有过相关记录。然而,从这些巢穴中 fledging 的雏鸟都是蓝山雀。
原文中“fledging”这个词可能有误,正确的可能是“fledged”,这里暂按原文翻译,整体意思可能是“羽翼丰满(离巢)”之类意思,推测应该是“fledged”更合适。