Cumming E
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1975;6(3):187-91. doi: 10.2190/E1NP-0QE8-L3L7-T551.
The co-author of Disengagement Theory restates the central propositions, suggests new studies that might test its usefulness, and examines some of the controversy that has been generated over the years either by the theory itself or the context in which it was set forth. The four key propositions focus upon decreasing life space with advancing age, the individual's own anticipation and participation in this process, a change in style of interaction, and the momentum of the disengagement process once it has begun. Although some useful research has been done, the theory remains poorly operationalized and largely untested. A measure of life space variety is proposed, and attention also directed to neuro-physiological findings. Several misunderstandings and misapplications of Disengagement Theory are discussed, including the erroneous idea that disengaged people necessarily are either higher or lower in morale than others, and the unenlightening controversy over "activity versus disengagement."
《脱离理论》的合著者重新阐述了核心命题,提出了一些可能检验其效用的新研究,并审视了多年来该理论本身或其提出背景所引发的一些争议。四个关键命题聚焦于随着年龄增长生活空间的减少、个体自身对这一过程的预期和参与、互动方式的变化,以及脱离过程一旦开始后的发展态势。尽管已经开展了一些有益的研究,但该理论在操作化方面仍很薄弱,且在很大程度上未经检验。文中提出了一种衡量生活空间多样性的方法,同时也关注神经生理学研究结果。还讨论了脱离理论的一些误解和误用情况,包括认为脱离者的士气必然高于或低于其他人这种错误观点,以及关于“活动与脱离”的毫无启发性的争议。