Wolke Dieter, Davé Shreya, Hayes Julie, Townsend Joy, Tomlin Maggie
Department of Psychology, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK.
Midwifery. 2002 Jun;18(2):145-54. doi: 10.1054/midw.2002.0305.
to determine whether any differences in maternal satisfaction with the examination of a newborn baby between midwives and junior paediatricians are maintained over a three-month period.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: randomised controlled trial. Eight hundred and twenty-six mother and baby pairs in a district general hospital in South East England were randomised to a junior paediatrician or a midwife for the routine examination. Four hundred and eighty-six mothers completed a maternal satisfaction questionnaire on day-one and again three-months later. Maternal satisfaction with the examination was analysed in relation to randomised group, process and background variables.
high satisfaction with the examination was reported by most mothers (day-one: 82%; three-months: 79%). At day-one, mothers whose babies were examined by a midwife were more satisfied with the examination (crude odds ratio (OR) for the lowest tertile of satisfaction 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.73). However, after controlling for provision of health education during the examination (e.g. discussing feeding, sleeping and skin care) and continuity of care provided, maternal satisfaction was no longer related to status of examiner (adjusted OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.52-1.33). Three months later, there was no significant difference in maternal satisfaction with midwife and junior paediatrician examinations of the newborn baby (crude OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.58-1.37). Discussion of health-care issues by the examiner during the examination was significantly related to increased satisfaction even at three-months. Three month ratings of low satisfaction with the examination were most strongly predicted by current maternal depressive mood, even when other factors were adjusted for (adjusted OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.19-5.59).
from the mother's perspective, the quality of midwife examination is at least as satisfactory as that of junior paediatricians and this perception is maintained over a three-month period. Satisfaction can be significantly enhanced if the examiner provides information on behavioural and health-care issues. The examination of the newborn baby provides an important window of opportunity for sharing information on newborn behaviour and care issues.
确定在三个月的时间里,助产士和初级儿科医生对新生儿检查的产妇满意度是否存在差异。
设计、地点和参与者:随机对照试验。英格兰东南部一家地区综合医院的826对母婴被随机分配给初级儿科医生或助产士进行常规检查。486名母亲在第一天和三个月后分别填写了一份产妇满意度问卷。分析了产妇对检查的满意度与随机分组、过程和背景变量之间的关系。
大多数母亲对检查表示高度满意(第一天:82%;三个月:79%)。在第一天,由助产士检查婴儿的母亲对检查更满意(满意度最低三分位数的粗比值比(OR)为0.49,95%置信区间为0.32 - 0.73)。然而,在控制了检查期间提供的健康教育(如讨论喂养、睡眠和皮肤护理)以及所提供护理的连续性后,产妇满意度与检查者身份不再相关(调整后的OR为0.83,95%置信区间为0.52 - 1.33)。三个月后,产妇对助产士和初级儿科医生对新生儿检查的满意度没有显著差异(粗OR为0.89,95%置信区间为0.58 - 1.37)。检查者在检查期间对医疗保健问题的讨论与满意度的提高显著相关,即使在三个月后也是如此。即使对其他因素进行了调整,当前产妇的抑郁情绪对三个月检查满意度低的评分预测作用最强(调整后的OR为2.58,95%置信区间为1.19 - 5.59)。
从母亲的角度来看,助产士检查的质量至少与初级儿科医生的检查质量一样令人满意,并且这种看法在三个月的时间里得以维持。如果检查者提供有关行为和医疗保健问题的信息,满意度可以显著提高。对新生儿的检查为分享有关新生儿行为和护理问题的信息提供了一个重要的机会窗口。