Mistiaen P
Hemodialysis Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nephrol Nurs J. 2001 Dec;28(6):601-4, 610-3; quiz 614-5.
A literature search completed over the period of 1980-1999 identified studies on the prevalence of thirst in hemodialysis (HD) patients and the relationship between thirst and interdialytic weight gain, as well as intervention studies in which thirst was used as an outcome variable. Twenty-three studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in the analysis. The prevalence of thirst varied between 6% and 95% across studies. In most studies more thirst was related to more weight gain. However, the studies were difficult to compare due to methodological differences. Three types of interventions were found: technical interventions in the dialysis mechanisms (increasing the frequency of dialysis sessions and varying the concentration of sodium in the dialysate), pharmaceutical interventions (ACE-inhibitors), and a dietetic intervention. Almost no conclusions could be drawn with regard to the effectiveness of these interventions due to methodological differences and weaknesses and due to the small sample sizes.
在1980年至1999年期间完成的一项文献检索,确定了关于血液透析(HD)患者口渴患病率、口渴与透析间期体重增加之间关系的研究,以及将口渴用作结果变量的干预研究。23项研究符合入选标准并纳入分析。各研究中口渴的患病率在6%至95%之间。在大多数研究中,口渴程度越高与体重增加越多相关。然而,由于方法学差异,这些研究难以进行比较。发现了三种类型的干预措施:透析机制方面的技术干预(增加透析次数和改变透析液中的钠浓度)、药物干预(血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂)和饮食干预。由于方法学差异和缺陷以及样本量较小,几乎无法就这些干预措施的有效性得出结论。