• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远视性准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后眼压测量

Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK.

作者信息

Wang Xiaohong, Shen Joanne, McCulley James P, Bowman R Wayne, Petroll W Matthew, Cavanagh H Dwight

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 75390-9057, USA.

出版信息

CLAO J. 2002 Jul;28(3):136-9.

PMID:12144232
Abstract

PURPOSE

Previous studies have shown that Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) underestimates intraocular pressure (IOP) following photorefractive keratometry (PRK) and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometry and pneumotonometry (PT) after hyperopic LASIK.

METHODS

The IOPs of 20 eyes of 15 patients who underwent hyperopia LASIK were prospectively evaluated. Central and peripheral IOP were measured with GAT and PT, and central and peripheral corneal thicknesses were measured with ultrasonographic pachymetry. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Postoperative GAT measurements of IOP made from the central (13.1+/-2.7 mm Hg) and peripheral (13.9+/-3.3 mm Hg) corneal areas were significantly lower (P <0.001) than central IOP measured preoperatively (17.0+/-2.5 mm Hg). Postoperative PT measurements from the central (17.4+/-3.2 mm Hg) and peripheral (17.6+/-2.9 mm Hg) corneal areas were slightly lower than preoperative central IOP (18.4+/-2.4 mm Hg), but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences between central and peripheral IOP measurements using either method.

CONCLUSION

The data demonstrate that GAT may underestimate IOP measurement, following hyperopic LASIK.

摘要

目的

以往研究表明,Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)会低估准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)和近视性准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后的眼压(IOP)。本研究的目的是评估远视性LASIK术后Goldmann压平眼压计和气压眼压计(PT)测量眼压的可靠性。

方法

前瞻性评估15例接受远视性LASIK手术患者的20只眼的眼压。使用GAT和PT测量中央和周边眼压,使用超声角膜测厚仪测量中央和周边角膜厚度。在术前和术后12个月对患者进行评估。

结果

术后通过GAT测量中央角膜区域(13.1±2.7mmHg)和周边角膜区域(13.9±3.3mmHg)的眼压明显低于术前测量的中央眼压(17.0±2.5mmHg)(P<0.001)。术后通过PT测量中央角膜区域(17.4±3.2mmHg)和周边角膜区域(17.6±2.9mmHg)的眼压略低于术前中央眼压(18.4±2.4mmHg),但无统计学意义。两种方法测量的中央和周边眼压之间无显著差异。

结论

数据表明,远视性LASIK术后GAT可能会低估眼压测量值。

相似文献

1
Intraocular pressure measurement after hyperopic LASIK.远视性准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后眼压测量
CLAO J. 2002 Jul;28(3):136-9.
2
Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study.影响近视和远视 LASIK 及光折射性角膜切削术后眼内压变化的因素:一项大样本研究。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Mar;122(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.033. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
3
Measurement of intraocular pressure in LASIK and LASEK patients using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.使用Reichert眼反应分析仪和Goldmann压平眼压计测量准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)和准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)患者的眼压。
J Refract Surg. 2008 Apr;24(4):366-70. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080401-09.
4
Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following LASIK using static, dynamic, and noncontact tonometry.使用静态、动态和非接触眼压测量法进行准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜生物力学和眼压的变化。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan;143(1):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.036. Epub 2006 Oct 20.
5
Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.不同类型屈光手术后帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计与压平眼压计的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 May;249(5):767-73. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1431-9. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
6
Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.应用飞秒激光制作角膜瓣的近视激光原位角膜磨镶术后,应用眼反应分析仪和压平眼压计检测角膜生物力学特性和眼压的变化。
J Glaucoma. 2015 Mar;24(3):195-201. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829da1ec.
7
Pneumotonometry versus Goldmann tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.近视患者准分子原位角膜磨镶术后气动眼压测量法与Goldmann眼压测量法的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Oct;25(10):1344-8. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00202-3.
8
Tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis treatment.准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗后的眼压测量
J Glaucoma. 2001 Aug;10(4):261-5. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200108000-00003.
9
Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure relationship in eyes with and without previous LASIK: comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometer with pneumatonometer.有或无既往准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)的眼睛中中央角膜厚度与眼压的关系:戈德曼压平眼压计与气动眼压计的比较
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):81-8.
10
Goldmann and modified Goldmann tonometry measuring intraocular pressure changes in eyes which underwent myopic laser in situ Keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy.Goldmann 眼压计和改良 Goldmann 眼压计测量接受近视激光原位角膜磨镶术和光折射性角膜切削术的眼睛的眼压变化。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02741-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery.不同类型屈光手术后帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计与压平眼压计的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 May;249(5):767-73. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1431-9. Epub 2010 Jun 25.