Suppr超能文献

使用多种测试组合评估骶髂关节区域功能障碍的存在:一项多中心测试者间可靠性研究。

Evaluation of the presence of sacroiliac joint region dysfunction using a combination of tests: a multicenter intertester reliability study.

作者信息

Riddle Daniel L, Freburger Janet K

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1200 E Broad St, Richmond, VA 23298-0224, USA.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2002 Aug;82(8):772-81.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The authors examined the intertester reliability of assessments made based on a composite of 4 tests of pelvic symmetry or sacroiliac joint (SIJ) movement that are advocated in the literature for identifying people with SIJ region dysfunction. "Sacroiliac joint region dysfunction" is a term used to describe pain in or around the region of the joint that is presumed to be due to malalignment or abnormal movement of the SIJs.

SUBJECTS

Sixty-five patients with low back pain and unilateral buttock pain were seen in 1 of 11 outpatient clinics.

METHODS

Thirty-four therapists, randomly paired for each subject, served as examiners. Kappa coefficients and observed proportions of positive (Ppos) and negative (Pneg) agreement were calculated to estimate reliability.

RESULTS

For the composite test results, percentages of agreement ranged from 60% to 69%, kappa coefficients varied from.11 to.23, and Ppos was lower than 50%.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Reliability of measurements obtained with the 4 tests appears to be too low for clinical use. Given the measurement error found in this study, the authors suspect it is likely that either the proper treatment technique will not be chosen based on the test results or the intervention will be applied to the wrong side. The 4 tests probably should not be used to examine patients suspected of having SIJ region dysfunction, although the role of therapist training in use of the procedures is unclear.

摘要

背景与目的

作者对基于文献中所倡导的用于识别骶髂关节(SIJ)区域功能障碍患者的4项骨盆对称性或骶髂关节活动度综合测试评估的测试者间信度进行了研究。“骶髂关节区域功能障碍”是一个用于描述关节区域内或其周围疼痛的术语,推测其是由于骶髂关节排列不齐或异常活动所致。

受试者

11家门诊诊所中的1家接待了65例下背痛和单侧臀部疼痛患者。

方法

34名治疗师,针对每个受试者随机配对,作为检查者。计算卡帕系数以及阳性(Ppos)和阴性(Pneg)一致性的观察比例,以评估信度。

结果

对于综合测试结果,一致性百分比范围为60%至69%,卡帕系数在0.11至0.23之间变化,且Ppos低于50%。

讨论与结论

用这4项测试获得的测量信度似乎过低,不适合临床使用。鉴于本研究中发现的测量误差,作者怀疑很可能要么无法根据测试结果选择合适的治疗技术,要么干预措施会应用到错误的一侧。这4项测试可能不应被用于检查疑似有骶髂关节区域功能障碍的患者,尽管治疗师培训在这些程序使用中的作用尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验