Vincent-Smith B, Gibbons P
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Human Development, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Man Ther. 1999 May;4(2):87-93. doi: 10.1054/math.1999.0173.
The practice of musculoskeletal medicine requires the use of a wide variety of clinical examination procedures to establish a diagnosis, plan treatment, and monitor patient progress. Many of these examination procedures constitute a significant part of daily practice. Despite their extensive use, the reliability and validity of many of these assessment procedures remains questionable. The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of palpatory findings for the standing flexion test; one test for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction. Nine examiners performed the standing flexion test on nine asymptomatic subjects. Inter-examiner reliability data, with a mean percentage agreement of 42% and a kappa coefficient of 0.052, demonstrated statistically insignificant reliability. Intra-examiner reliability data demonstrated a mean percentage agreement of 68% and a kappa coefficient of 0.46 indicating moderate reliability. These results suggest that the reliability of the standing flexion test as an indicator of SIJ dysfunction still remains questionable. Before this test can be relied upon as an accurate indicator of SIJ dysfunction it must undergo further research. This research must not only further standardize the procedure, but also ascertain reliability and validity.
肌肉骨骼医学的实践需要运用各种各样的临床检查程序来进行诊断、制定治疗方案以及监测患者的病情进展。这些检查程序中的许多构成了日常实践的重要部分。尽管它们被广泛使用,但其中许多评估程序的可靠性和有效性仍然存疑。本研究的目的是确定站立前屈试验触诊结果在检查者之间和检查者自身的可靠性;这是一种用于检测骶髂关节(SIJ)功能障碍的试验。九名检查者对九名无症状受试者进行了站立前屈试验。检查者之间的可靠性数据显示,平均一致率为42%,kappa系数为0.052,表明可靠性在统计学上不显著。检查者自身的可靠性数据显示,平均一致率为68%,kappa系数为0.46,表明可靠性为中等。这些结果表明,站立前屈试验作为SIJ功能障碍指标的可靠性仍然存疑。在该试验能够被可靠地作为SIJ功能障碍的准确指标之前,它必须接受进一步的研究。这项研究不仅必须进一步规范该程序,还必须确定其可靠性和有效性。