Lima Pedro O P, Melo Wenya P X, Bezerra Márcio A, Almeida Gabriel P L, Nunes Ana Carla L, Oliveira Rodrigo R
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, CE, Brazil.
League of Sport Physical Therapy, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, CE, Brazil.
J Chiropr Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
This study aimed to assess the intraexaminer and interexaminer reproducibility of the Downing test in sacroiliac joint evaluation in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals.
A reliability study was conducted with a test-retest design in 54 college students of both sexes. To assess the intraexaminer reproducibility, each participant was evaluated twice by the same examiner with a 7-day interval, and to assess the interexaminer reproducibility, each participant was evaluated by 2 examiners.
Of the 54 participants included in the study, 18 (33.3%) were asymptomatic and 36 (66.7%) were symptomatic; a total of 108 sacroiliac joints were evaluated. Sacroiliac joint diagnosis based on the Downing test presented low intraexaminer reproducibility in all participants (κ = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.03-0.22), in asymptomatic individuals (κ = 0.18, 95% CI 0.02-0.34), and in symptomatic individuals (κ = 0.28, 95% CI 0.17-0.39). The interexaminer reproducibility also was low in all participants (κ = 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.27), in asymptomatic individuals (κ = 0.22, 95% CI 0.15-0.37), and in symptomatic individuals (κ = 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.27). The standard error of the measurement values were not lower than smallest detectable change values considering a CI of 95% for all participants.
For this group of asymptomatic and symptomatic participants, the reproducibility of the Downing test was poor. The clinical utility of this test used in isolation is not supported by the present study.
本研究旨在评估唐宁试验在有症状和无症状个体骶髂关节评估中检查者内和检查者间的可重复性。
采用重测设计对54名男女大学生进行了一项可靠性研究。为评估检查者内的可重复性,每位参与者由同一位检查者间隔7天进行两次评估;为评估检查者间的可重复性,每位参与者由两名检查者进行评估。
纳入研究的54名参与者中,18名(33.3%)无症状,36名(66.7%)有症状;共评估了108个骶髂关节。基于唐宁试验的骶髂关节诊断在所有参与者(κ = 0.12,95%置信区间[CI] 0.03 - 0.22)、无症状个体(κ = 0.18,95% CI 0.02 - 0.34)和有症状个体(κ = 0.28,95% CI 0.17 - 0.39)中检查者内可重复性均较低。检查者间可重复性在所有参与者(κ = 0.18,95% CI 0.09 - 0.27)、无症状个体(κ = 0.22,95% CI 0.15 - 0.37)和有症状个体(κ = 0.16,95% CI 0.05 - 0.27)中也较低。考虑到所有参与者95%的置信区间,测量值的标准误差不低于最小可检测变化值。
对于这组有症状和无症状的参与者,唐宁试验的可重复性较差。本研究不支持单独使用该试验的临床实用性。