Meredith Peter A
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Glasgow, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, GL 116NT United Kingdom.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4 Suppl 1):15-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01035.x.
The major randomized trials in hypertension have unequivocally demonstrated the benefits of treatment. None of these trials have sought to address the issue of the potential superiority of 24-hour blood pressure control. However, there is a volume of epidemiologic evidence to suggest that prevention of target organ damage requires the sustained reduction of blood pressure throughout the full 24-hour period between doses. Historically, some antihypertensive drugs have been approved for use at high doses to achieve apparent blood pressure control at the end of the once-daily dosing interval. This approach is flawed; attention is focused on this single time point at the end of the dosing interval, without due regard to the antihypertensive response during the rest of the dosing interval. Subsequently, guidelines formulated by the US Food and Drug Administration suggest that all antihypertensive drugs should consistently achieve a trough:peak ratio decline in blood pressure of at least 50%. Evidence suggests that antihypertensive drugs, such as calcium antagonists and angiotensin II receptor blockers, differ in their ability to provide 24-hour blood pressure control. For example, unlike some other angiotensin II receptor blockers, telmisartan provides consistent reduction of blood pressure during the 24-hour period.
高血压领域的主要随机试验已明确证明了治疗的益处。这些试验均未试图解决24小时血压控制潜在优势的问题。然而,有大量流行病学证据表明,预防靶器官损害需要在两次给药之间的整个24小时期间持续降低血压。从历史上看,一些抗高血压药物已被批准高剂量使用,以便在每日一次给药间隔结束时实现明显的血压控制。这种方法存在缺陷;注意力集中在给药间隔结束时的这个单一时间点,而没有充分考虑给药间隔其余时间的降压反应。随后,美国食品药品监督管理局制定的指南建议,所有抗高血压药物应始终使血压的谷峰比下降至少50%。有证据表明,抗高血压药物,如钙拮抗剂和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂,在提供24小时血压控制的能力方面存在差异。例如,与其他一些血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂不同,替米沙坦在24小时期间能持续降低血压。